ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Characteristics of black bear-related trauma: A retrospective observational study.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nationwide perspective on bear-inflicted injuries in japan and future directions for data integration: a reply to the comment on "CT-based assessment of bear-inflicted maxillofacial injuries".Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Ocular injuries caused by Japanese black bears: a 10-year retrospective analysis of severity and clinical outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- CT-based assessment of bear-inflicted maxillofacial injuries: evaluation using the facial injury severity scale and its association with hospitalization duration.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Characteristics of black bear-related trauma: A retrospective observational study.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
- Psychological Sequelae of Injuries Caused by Asiatic Black Bear Attacks: A Follow-Up Study.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Bear-related trauma is a significant concern in Japan. This study identified trauma patterns, outcomes, and therapeutic approaches for bear-related injuries treated. Methods: This retrospective observational study used medical records from Akita University Hospital, focusing on patients with bear-related trauma in 2023. Demographic data, injury details, treatment procedures, and outcomes were extracted. Results: The study included 20 patients (median age: 74.5 years, 65% males). Most injuries occurred in human habitats, mainly in autumn, with the face being the most affected area (90%). Three patients required emergency transfusions and tracheal intubation. Emergency surgery was performed in 52.6% of patients, and 42.1% were admitted to the intensive care unit. All patients survived with a median hospital stay of 17 days. However, 15.8% of patients had significant sequelae, such as blindness. Despite prophylactic antibiotics, wound infections occurred in 21.1% of patients, particularly in deep wounds that were not adequately washed under general anesthesia. Conclusions: Bear-related trauma often results in severe upper-body injuries that require prompt medical intervention. These findings highlight the need for improved preventive measures and strategies for initial treatment and long-term care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.