ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024
Outpatient Renal Function Screening Before Contrast-Enhanced CT Examinations.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media can cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m². The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines recommend renal function screening based on medical history, but their effectiveness has been under-evaluated. This retrospective study included 2,560 consecutive adult outpatients without eGFR measurements within 180 days before contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary hospital from July through September 2023. On the day of CT, they underwent eGFR tests and 1.1% had an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m², preferentially with histories of gout and renal disease. According to the ACR and ESUR strategies, 16.9% and 38.8% of all study participants were positive, respectively, identifying 92.6% and 96.3% of patients with renal insufficiency. Both strategies demonstrated high negative predictive values. These results support selective renal function screening before contrast-enhanced examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.