Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376192›Full record

ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2024

Advancing Research, Writing, and Publishing in Nursing: Addressing Challenges and Improving Standards.

Gaziza A Arshabayeva, Ainur B Qumar, Marlen Yessirkepov, Olena Zimba, Burhan Fatih Kocyigit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Perception of nurse academicians on academic publications: A cross-sectional study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaziza A ArshabayevaDepartment of Therapy and Nursing, Avicenna Higher Medical College, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0474-1089
Ainur B QumarDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0457-7205
Marlen YessirkepovDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-6918
Olena ZimbaDepartment of Rheumatology, Immunology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4188-8486
Burhan Fatih KocyigitDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Adana, Türkiye. bfk2701@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurses constitute nearly 50% of the worldwide health workforce, and the World Health Organisation has advocated for an enlargement of their roles to guarantee fair health care and address the increasing need for services. The growing specialization in nursing practice has led to a rise in educational options for nurses, including the growth of PhD programs. These programs play a crucial role in preparing nurse researchers and educators. This growth underlines the importance of evidence-based practice and high-quality academic writing in nursing. The article highlights the importance of nurses' involvement in creating evidence-based practice guidelines. The active engagement of nurses in developing evidence-based practice recommendations is essential to ensure the practicality, relevance, and grounding of these guidelines in real-world clinical experiences. The advancement of nursing depends mainly on using rigorous research procedures to generate, analyze, and disseminate knowledge and data. The current article discusses essential research methodologies, including interviews, surveys, and bibliometric and altmetric analyses. It also aims to tackle concerns about inadequate writing skills, plagiarism, and insufficient comprehension of ethical norms in research and publishing. The recommended strategies to promote nursing research and publications encompass enhancing writing skills through specialized education, embracing open-access publishing, and utilizing social media for broader distribution following publication. Implementing these approaches would increase the quality and impact of nursing publications and reinforce nursing's role in defining health policy and enhancing the care of patients.

Indexed as

PublishingWritingHumansNursing ResearchEthicsNursingNursing ResearchPeriodicals as TopicPublishing

Identifiers

PMID39376192
PMCPMC11458379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.