Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376078›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2024

Investigation of interfractional range variation owing to anatomical changes with beam directions based on water equivalent thickness in proton therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Yuhei Kikkawa, Hideaki Ueda, Yusuke Uchinami, Norio Katoh, Hidefumi Aoyama, Yoichi M Ito, Kohei Yokokawa, Ye Chen, Taeko Matsuura, Naoki Miyamoto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuhei KikkawaGraduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.
Hideaki UedaFaculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.
Yusuke UchinamiFaculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North15 West7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan.
Norio KatohFaculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North15 West7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan.
Hidefumi AoyamaFaculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North15 West7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan.
Yoichi M ItoInstitute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, North14 West5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan.
Kohei YokokawaDepartment of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, North14 West5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan.
Ye ChenFaculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.
Taeko MatsuuraFaculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.
Naoki MiyamotoFaculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.
Seishin TakaoFaculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North13 West8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23he2302001Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJFS2101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the interfractional anatomical range variations (ARVs) with beam directions and their impact on dose distribution in intensity modulated proton therapy, we analyzed water equivalent thickness (WET) from 10 patients with pancreatic cancer. The distributions of the interfractional WET difference ($\Delta{\mathrm{WET}}^{\theta }$) across 360° were visualized using polar histograms. Interfractional ARVs were evaluated using the mean absolute error and ΔWET pass rate, indicating the percentage of $\Delta \mathrm{WE}{\mathrm{T}}^{\theta }$ < thresholds. The impact on dose distribution in proton therapy was evaluated based on two treatment plans for 40 Gy(RBE)/5 fractions: 'Plan A', using two beam angles, in which the target was closest to the body surface among four perpendicular directions; and 'Plan B', using two beam angles with small ARVs. Analysis revealed individual variations in angular trends of interfractional ARVs. Three distinct trends were identified: Group 1 exhibited small ARVs around posterior directions; Group 2 exhibited small ARVs except ~60°; Group 3 demonstrated minimal ARVs only ~90°. In dose evaluation, while 150° and 210° were selected in Plan B for 9 out of 10 patients, for the remaining patient, 60° and 90° were chosen. Comparing dose volume histogram parameters for all patients, Plan B significantly reduced target coverage loss while maintaining organ-at-risk sparing comparable to Plan A. These results demonstrated that selecting beam angles with small interfractional ARVs for each patient enhances the robustness of dose distribution, reducing target coverage loss.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsProton TherapyRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedWaterAgedDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageWaterinterfractional range variationpancreatic cancerproton therapywater equivalent thickness

Identifiers

PMID39376078
PMCPMC11629986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.