ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2024
How marine are Marine Stramenopiles (MAST)? A cross-system evaluation.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil Microbial Diversity in Páramos Wetland of the Colombian Andes Reveals Novel and Unique Features Within a Global Wetland Database.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- An Overview of Orchidaceae from Brazil: Advances and Shortfalls After 400 Years of Studies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metagenomics of the MAST-3 stramenopile,Microbial genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine Stramenopiles (MAST) were first described two decades ago through ribosomal RNA gene (rRNA gene) sequences from marine surveys of microbial eukaryotes. MAST comprise several independent lineages at the base of the Stramenopiles. Despite their prevalence in the ocean, the majority of MAST diversity remains uncultured. Previous studies, mainly in marine environments, have explored MAST's cell morphology, distribution, trophic strategies, and genomics using culturing-independent methods. In comparison, less is known about their presence outside marine habitats. Here, we analyse the extensive EukBank dataset to assess the extent to which MAST can be considered marine protists. Additionally, by incorporating newly available rRNA gene sequences, we update Stramenopiles phylogeny, identifying three novel MAST lineages. Our results indicate that MAST are primarily marine with notable exceptions within MAST-2 and MAST-12, where certain subclades are prevalent in freshwater and soil habitats. In the marine water column, only a few MAST species, particularly within clades -1, -3, -4, and -7, dominate and exhibit clear latitudinal distribution patterns. Overall, the massive sequencing dataset analysed in our study confirms and partially expands the previously described diversity of MASTs groups and underscores the predominantly marine nature of most of these uncultured lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.