ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Comparative effectiveness of endoscopic plantar fasciotomy, needle knife therapy, and conventional painkillers in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a real-world evidence study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus open plantar fasciotomy for treatment of plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of ultrasound-guided small needle knife on patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Indigenous Endoscopic-Assisted Surgery for Intractable Plantar Fasciitis: A Case Series.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Wharton's Jelly Tissue Allografts for Tearing in the Plantar Fascia: A Case Series.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plantar fascia (PF) is the commonest causes of foot pain in the adult population. Several surgical treatments are available to treat PF. This study was aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of three different treatments for plantar fasciitis. It was conducted among 60 patients, divided equally into three treatment groups named Needle Knife Therapy, Endoscopic Plantar Fasciotomy, and Conventional Painkillers. Descriptive and analytical analysis were done by using SPSS 25 software. VAS and AOFAS scores were analyzed. The maximum (n = 31) participants were in 41-60 year age range group with normal BMI. These differences of mean VAS and AOFAS pain scores between different treatment groups were statistically significant (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.01). Both scores found lower in the Endoscopic Plantar Fasciotomy group. This study opens a new window of knowledge to achieve sustained pain relief and functional improvement. Moreover, the superiority of Endoscopic Plantar Fasciotomy in treating plantar fasciitis compared to Needle Knife Therapy and Conventional Painkillers was explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.