ArticleMicrobiome2024
Viromes vs. mixed community metagenomes: choice of method dictates interpretation of viral community ecology.
Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the ecological drivers of bacteriophage diversity and functional viral potential in the skin of the axolotl Ambystoma altamirani.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Preparation method shapes the recovery and ecological interpretation of DNA and RNA soil viral communities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Alterations in the fecal virome and bacteriome-virome interplay in IPAH.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Article
- DNA Viral Size Fraction Metagenomics for Human Stool Samples.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- Tools and approaches to study the human gut virome: from the bench to bioinformatics.mSystems · 2026Review
- Gut virome dynamics: from commensal to critical player in health and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Soil amelioration impacts viral ecology in saline-alkali lands.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Viromics approaches for the study of viral diversity and ecology in microbiomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Diversity and Ecological Potentials of Marine Viruses Inhabiting Continental Shelf Seas.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Ecosystem health shapes viral ecology in peatland soils.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Prophages and their interactions with lytic phages in the human gut microbiota and their impact on microbial diversity, gut health, and disease.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs): Current Etiological Perspectives and Advances in Viral Metagenomics-A Review.Viruses · 2025Review
- DNA extraction and virome processing methods strongly influence recovered human gut viral community characteristics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Eco-evolutionary strategies drive viral diversification in nutrient-poor soils across elevation gradients.National science review · 2025Article
- Advanced Strategies in Phage Research: Innovations, Applications, and Challenges.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Differences in the genomic potential of soil bacterial and viral communities between urban greenspaces and natural arid soils.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundViruses, the majority of which are uncultivated, are among the most abundant biological entities on Earth. From altering microbial physiology to driving community dynamics, viruses are fundamental members of microbiomes. While the number of studies leveraging viral metagenomics (viromics) for studying uncultivated viruses is growing, standards for viromics research are lacking. Viromics can utilize computational discovery of viruses from total metagenomes of all community members (hereafter metagenomes) or use physical separation of virus-specific fractions (hereafter viromes). However, differences in the recovery and interpretation of viruses from metagenomes and viromes obtained from the same samples remain understudied.
resultsHere, we compare viral communities from paired viromes and metagenomes obtained from 60 diverse samples across human gut, soil, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Overall, viral communities obtained from viromes had greater species richness and total viral genome abundances than those obtained from metagenomes, although there were some exceptions. Despite this, metagenomes still contained many viral genomes not detected in viromes. We also found notable differences in the predicted lytic state of viruses detected in viromes vs metagenomes at the time of sequencing. Other forms of variation observed include genome presence/absence, genome quality, and encoded protein content between viromes and metagenomes, but the magnitude of these differences varied by environment.
conclusionsOverall, our results show that the choice of method can lead to differing interpretations of viral community ecology. We suggest that the choice of whether to target a metagenome or virome to study viral communities should be dependent on the environmental context and ecological questions being asked. However, our overall recommendation to researchers investigating viral ecology and evolution is to pair both approaches to maximize their respective benefits. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.