Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375740›Full record

Trial reportParasites & vectors2024

The attrition, physical and insecticidal durability of two dual active ingredient nets (Interceptor® G2 and Royal Guard®) in Benin, West Africa: results from a durability study embedded in a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Corine Ngufor, Josias Fagbohoun, Augustin Fongnikin, Juniace Ahoga, Thomas Syme, Idelphonse Ahogni, Manfred Accrombessi, Natacha Protopopoff, Jackie Cook, Edouard Dangbenon and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03931473 (Efficacy of Two Dual Active Ingredient Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets for Control of Malaria Transmitted by Pyrethroid Resistant Vectors in Benin), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03931473 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Two Dual Active Ingredient Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets for Control of Malaria Transmitted by Pyrethroid Resistant Vectors in Benin

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2020 to 2023Enrolled1,800ConditionsMalaria, AnemiaArmsBed nets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Corine NguforLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK. corine.ngufor@lshtm.ac.uk.
Josias FagbohounCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Augustin FongnikinCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Juniace AhogaCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Thomas SymeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Idelphonse AhogniCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Manfred AccrombessiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Natacha ProtopopoffLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Jackie CookLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Edouard DangbenonCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Arthur SoviLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Marie BaesCentre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium.
Olivier PigeonCentre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium.
Damien TodjinouCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Renaud GovoetchanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Germain Gil PadonouCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Martin AkogbetoCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies evaluating the attrition, physical and insecticidal durability of dual active ingredient (AI) insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are essential for making programmatic decisions regarding their deployment. We performed a prospective study embedded in a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) to evaluate the attrition, fabric integrity and insecticidal durability of Interceptor® G2 (alpha-cypermethrin-chlorfenapyr) and Royal Guard® (alpha-cypermethrin-pyriproxyfen), compared to Interceptor® (alpha-cypermethrin) in Benin.

methodsA total of 2428 study nets in 1093 randomly selected households in five clusters per arm of the cRCT were monitored for ITN attrition and fabric integrity every 6-12 months post-distribution. Householders were further surveyed to investigate non-study net use and their preference for ITN fabric types used in the study nets. A second cohort of 120 nets per ITN type were withdrawn every 12 months and assessed for chemical content and insecticidal activity in laboratory bioassays. Alpha-cypermethrin bioefficacy was investigated using the susceptible Anopheles gambiae Kisumu strain, and chlorfenapyr and pyriproxyfen bioefficacy were investigated using the pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles coluzzii Akron strain. Net pieces were tested in WHO cone bioassays and tunnel tests for alpha-cypermethrin and in tunnel tests for chlorfenapyr; pyriproxyfen activity was assessed in cone bioassays as the reduction in fertility of blood-fed survivors using ovary dissection. Bioefficacy was expressed as the proportion of ITNs passing predetermined WHO criteria, namely knock-down ≥ 95% or 24/72 h mortality ≥ 80% or reduction in fertility ≥ 50%.

resultsOverall ITN survivorship was 52% at 24 months and fell to 15% at 36 months. Median ITN survival time was lower with Royal Guard® relative to Interceptor® [1.6 vs 2.3 years; hazard ratio (HR) 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-1.66; p < 0.001] and Interceptor® G2 (1.6 vs 2.1 years; HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.47; p < 0.001). Householders overwhelmingly preferred polyester nets over polyethylene nets (96%), and more Royal Guard® nets were replaced with spare polyester nets from previous campaigns. All Royal Guard® nets passed efficacy criteria for alpha-cypermethrin at all time points (100%) while ITN pass rates after 24 months had fallen to < 40% for pyriproxyfen and chlorfenapyr. The chemical content analysis showed a higher loss rate of the non-pyrethroid insecticides relative to the pyrethroids in each dual ingredient AI ITN; 74% vs 47% for Royal Guard® and 85% vs 63% for Interceptor® G2 at 36 months.

conclusionsThe median ITN survival time for Interceptor® G2 (2.1 years) and Royal Guard® (1.6 years) in Benin is substantially lower than 3 years. Royal Guard® nets were discarded more quickly by householders, partly due to their low preference for polyethylene nets. The insecticidal activity of the non-pyrethroid insecticides in both dual AI ITNs was short-lived compared to alpha-cypermethrin. The results corroborate the findings from the cRCT conducted in Benin.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito ControlPyrethrinsAnimalsBeninFemaleHumansMalariaProspective StudiesPyridineschlorfenapyrcypermethrinInsecticidesPyrethrinsPyridinespyriproxyfenAlpha-cypermethrinAttritionBioefficacyChlorfenapyrDual active ingredientsDurabilityFabric integrityInsecticide-treated netInterceptor®Interceptor® G2PyriproxyfenRoyal Guard®Survivorship

Identifiers

PMID39375740
PMCPMC11459981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.