ReviewJournal of cheminformatics2024
Insights into predicting small molecule retention times in liquid chromatography using deep learning.
Review in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MetScribeR: A Semiautomated Tool for Data Processing of In-House LC-MS Metabolite Reference Libraries.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Do experimental projection methods outcompete retention time prediction models in non-target screening? A case study on LC/HRMS interlaboratory comparison data.The Analyst · 2025Article
- AI redefines mass spectrometry chemicals identification: retention time prediction in metabolomics and for a Human Exposome Project.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In untargeted metabolomics, structures of small molecules are annotated using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry by leveraging information from the molecular retention time (RT) in the chromatogram and m/z (formerly called ''mass-to-charge ratio'') in the mass spectrum. However, correct identification of metabolites is challenging due to the vast array of small molecules. Therefore, various in silico tools for mass spectrometry peak alignment and compound prediction have been developed; however, the list of candidate compounds remains extensive. Accurate RT prediction is important to exclude false candidates and facilitate metabolite annotation. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to significant breakthroughs in the use of deep learning models in various fields. Release of a large RT dataset has mitigated the bottlenecks limiting the application of deep learning models, thereby improving their application in RT prediction tasks. This review lists the databases that can be used to expand training datasets and concerns the issue about molecular representation inconsistencies in datasets. It also discusses the application of AI technology for RT prediction, particularly in the 5 years following the release of the METLIN small molecule RT dataset. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the AI applications used for RT prediction, highlighting the progress and remaining challenges. SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: This article focuses on the advancements in small molecule retention time prediction in computational metabolomics over the past five years, with a particular emphasis on the application of AI technologies in this field. It reviews the publicly available datasets for small molecule retention time, the molecular representation methods, the AI algorithms applied in recent studies. Furthermore, it discusses the effectiveness of these models in assisting with the annotation of small molecule structures and the challenges that must be addressed to achieve practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.