Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375678›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Improving learning experience through implementing standardized team-based learning process in undergraduate medical education.

Rebecca Andrews-Dickert, Ranjini Nagaraj, Lilian Zhan, Laura Knittig, Yuan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca Andrews-DickertDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-0729
Ranjini NagarajCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Texas, USA.
Lilian ZhanCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Texas, USA.
Laura KnittigCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Texas, USA.
Yuan ZhaoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Texas, USA. yxz028@shsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-4088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTeam-Based Learning (TBL) is a highly structured active learning methodology shown to have positive learning outcomes in undergraduate medical education (UME). While many medical schools have increasingly adopted TBL, there is considerable variation reported in the literature in the implementation of the standard sequence and key components of TBL. The extent to which this variation affects the benefits of TBL is not well understood. This study aims to assess the impact of implementing the standardized framework of the TBL process on student perception of the benefits of TBL.

methodsFaculty at our institute were surveyed to determine the frequency of implementation of TBL standards, as described in the literature. Second-year osteopathic medical students (OMS II) were surveyed for their perception of the experience of TBL at the beginning of the academic year. Curricular interventions targeting the enforcement of the standard steps and key components of TBL were implemented in a particular 6-week system course. The students were re-surveyed at the end of the course. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed on quantitative and qualitative data.

resultsTwenty four of 31 (77.4%) faculty participated in the faculty survey, 53 of 105 OMS II students (50.4%) participated in the pre-intervention survey, and 72 of 104 OMS II students (69.2%) participated in the post-intervention survey. Faculty survey results indicated inconsistent implementation of key steps and components of the TBL process. Comparisons of student pre- and post-survey means of the perceived value of various aspects of TBL showed significant improvement in multiple aspects of the TBL process, including readiness assurance tests, immediate feedback, and application activities. Both before and after the intervention, students highly rated the value of teamwork and opportunities for practical application of concepts within TBL.

conclusionWhile medical students value teamwork in UME and professional development, their perception of TBL can be less than positive if not conducted deliberatively. Assessment of the implementation of the standard TBL steps and components and development of corresponding targeted interventions may improve the TBL experience of medical students. Our process could be generalized to help educators interested in improving TBL in their home institutes.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateGroup ProcessesProblem-Based LearningStudents, MedicalHumansOsteopathic MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesAdult learningMedical students learningTeaching methodTeam-based learningUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID39375678
PMCPMC11459711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.