Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375634›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2024

Soft and hard tissue evaluation for vestibular socket therapy of immediately placed implants in infected and non-infected sockets: a 1-year prospective cohort study.

Abdelsalam Elaskary, Abdelrahman Thabet, Mai Hussin, Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04787224 (Soft and Hard Tissue Evaluation for Vestibular Socket Therapy of Immediately Placed Implants in Infected and Non-infected Sockets), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04787224 completednot on this map

Soft and Hard Tissue Evaluation for Vestibular Socket Therapy of Immediately Placed Implants in Infected and Non-infected Sockets: A 1-year Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled26ConditionsImplant Site InfectionArmsimmediate implant with vestibular socket therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdelsalam ElaskaryPrivate Practice, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abdelrahman ThabetEndodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mai HussinHead of the Research Department, Ministry of Health, Alexandria, Egypt.
Iman Abd-ElWahab RadiProfessor of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University; Vice dean of School of Dentistry, Badya University; Member of Evidence-Based Dentistry Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 ElSaraya St, EL Manial, Cairo, 11553, Egypt. iman.abdelwahab@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmediate implant placement using vestibular socket therapy (VST) proved to offer a successful treatment option in compromised sockets. However, the presence of active signs infection complicates immediate implants in sockets with defective labial plates, due to the possible contamination of the implant or the bone graft with existing infected tissues or oral environment via the fistula. This study, therefore, aims to explore the success of immediate implant placement using VST in managing infected compromised sockets.

methodsWe included 26 age- and sex-matched patients with 41 implants sites. Thirteen patients had 19 infected (group I) and 13 had 21 non-infected type 2 sockets (group N). Both groups were treated using vestibular socket therapy (VST) and a 6-day protocol. Implant survival, changes in facial bone thickness, and mid, mesial, and distal mucosal levels were evaluated 1 year after implant placement. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare both groups. Furthermore, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to study changes with time within each group. The statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.

resultsAll implants survived; no significant difference was found between groups N and I regarding apical, mid, and crestal bone thickness and soft tissue level, except at the mesial papilla, where the recession was significantly more in group N than in group I. Changes over time were statistically significant in the apical, mid, and crestal bone thickness in both groups. The mean bone thickness gain ranged from 0.85 to 2.4 mm and 0.26-1.63 mm in groups I and N, respectively. Additionally, the mean mucosal recession ranged from 0.29 to 0.51 mm and 0.39-1.47 mm in groups I and N, respectively.

conclusionWithin the limitations of this study immediate implant placement in type II infected sockets using the 6-day protocol and VST achieved 100% implant survival, while maintaining the regenerated facial bone thickness with minimal mucosal recession.

trial registrationThe protocol for this study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov at 3/10/2021 (registration number NCT04787224).

Indexed as

Immediate Dental Implant LoadingTooth SocketAdultAgedDental Implants, Single-ToothFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBone graftGuided bone regenerationImmediate placementInfected socketsSoft tissue levelType II socketsVestibular socket therapy

Identifiers

PMID39375634
PMCPMC11460050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.