ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Clinic, CT radiomics, and deep learning combined model for the prediction of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning model based on clinical and imaging features for predicting fungal infections in children with leukemia.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- An interpretable radiomics-machine learning model for early risk stratification of invasive fungal infections in community-acquired pneumonia: a dual-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- 3D deep learning model to predict the recurrence of stage IA invasive lung adenocarcinoma after sub-lobar resection: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based risk prediction tool for early identification of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in immunocompetent patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- A Silent Threat in Post-Tuberculosis Patients: Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis Survey in Multiple Regions of Indonesia (I-CHROME Study).Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting Ki-67 expression levels in non-small cell lung cancer using an explainable CT-based deep learning radiomics model.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a Machine-Learning Immuno-Serologic Diagnostic Model for Non-Neutropenic Invasive Pulmonary Fungal Disease.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a serious fungal infection. However, current diagnostic methods have limitations. The purpose of this study was to use artificial intelligence to achieve a more accurate diagnosis of IPA.
methodsTotally 263 patients (148 cases of IPA, 115 cases of non-IPA) were retrospectively enrolled from a single institution and randomly divided into training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3. Clinic-radiological independent risk factors for IPA were screened using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, after which a clinic-radiological model was constructed. The optimal radiomics features were extracted and screened based on CT images to construct the radiomics label score (Rad-score) and radiomics model. The optimal DL features were extracted and screened using four pre-trained convolutional neural networks, respectively, followed by the construction of the DL label score (DL-score) and DL model. Then, the radiomics-DL model was constructed. Finally, the combined model was constructed based on clinic-radiological independent risk factors, the Rad-score, and the DL-score. LR was adopted as the classifier. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn, and the areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of each model in predicting IPA. Additionally, based on the best-performing model on the LR classifier, four other machine learning (ML) classifiers were constructed to evaluate the predictive value for IPA.
resultsThe AUC of the clinic-radiological model for predicting IPA in the training and test sets was 0.845 and 0.765, respectively. The AUC of the radiomics-DL and combined models in the training set was 0.871 and 0.932, while in the test set was 0.851 and 0.881, respectively. The combined model showed better predictive performance than all other models. DCA showed that taking 0.00-1.00 as the threshold, the clinical benefit of the combined model was higher than that of all other models. Then, the combined model was trained on four other machine learning classifiers, all of which achieved AUC values above 0.80 in the test set, showing good performance in predicting IPA.
conclusionClinic, CT radiomics, and DL combined model could be used to predict IPA effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.