Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375599›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024

Effect of low vs. high vancomycin trough level on the clinical outcomes of adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Subhash Chander, Roopa Kumari, Hong Yu Wang, Yaqub Nadeem Mohammed, Om Parkash, Sindhu Lohana, Fnu Sorath, Abhi Chand Lohana, Fnu Sadarat, Sheena Shiwlani

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Subhash ChanderDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. subhash.chander@mssm.edu.
Roopa KumariDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Hong Yu WangDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Yaqub Nadeem MohammedDepartment of Medicine, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, WV, USA.
Om ParkashDepartment of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Sindhu LohanaDepartment of Medicine, AGA khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fnu SorathDepartment of Medicine, Dow University Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abhi Chand LohanaDepartment of Medicine, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, WV, USA.
Fnu SadaratDepartment of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sheena ShiwlaniDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectiveThe Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend vancomycin trough levels of 15-20 mg/L for severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, recent consensus guidelines of four infectious disease organizations no longer recommend vancomycin dosing using minimum serum trough concentrations. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of low (< 15 mg/L) vs. high (≥ 15 mg/L) vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes in adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections.

methodA systematic literature review from inception to December 2022 was conducted using four online databases, followed by a meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest included clinical response/efficacy, microbial clearance, length of ICU stay, treatment failure, nephrotoxicity, and mortality.

resultsFourteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria from which vancomycin trough concentration data were available for 5,228 participants. Our analysis found no association between vancomycin trough levels and clinical response [OR = 1.06 (95%CI 0.41-2.72], p = 0.91], microbial clearance [OR = 0.47 (95% CI 0.23-0.96), p = 0.04], ICU length of stay [MD=-1.01 (95%CI -5.73-3.71), p = 0.68], or nephrotoxicity [OR = 0.57 (95% CI 0.31-1.06), p = 0.07]. However, low trough levels were associated with a non-significant trend towards a lower risk of treatment failure [OR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-1.10), p = 0.28] and were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality [OR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.90), p = 0.002].

conclusionExcept for a lower risk of treatment failure and all-cause mortality at low vancomycin trough levels, this meta-analysis found no significant association between vancomycin trough levels and clinical outcomes in adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsSepsisVancomycinAdultHumansLength of StayMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinMRSASepsisSeptic shock patientsTrough levelsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39375599
PMCPMC11457423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.