ArticleBMC genomics2024
Comparative genomic analysis of pathogenic factors of Listeria spp. using whole-genome sequencing.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predicting Antibiotic Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Review
- Hybrid Genome Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of Three NovelFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of virulence factors overexpression on Listeria monocytogenes F2365 epidemic strain fitness and the limitations of surrogate species in UHT and raw milk.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Phage-Based Control ofViruses · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes is an important foodborne pathogen known for causing listeriosis. To gain insights into the pathogenicity, genetic characterization, and evolution of various Listeria species, in vitro cell adhesion and invasion ability assays and whole-genome sequencing were performed using four Listeria strains isolated from livestock and poultry slaughterhouses. The four Listeria strains exhibited adhesion and invasion abilities in Caco-2 and RAW264.7 cells. Pathogenic Liv1-1 and Lm2-20 had higher adhesion ability, but non-pathogenic Lin4-99 was more invasive than Lm2-20 (p < 0.05). Genetic characterization revealed the presence of a single chromosome without plasmid across four strains with similar whole-genome sizes and G + C% content. Analysis of key pathogenic genes underscored the presence of multiple virulence genes among the four Listeria strains. In contrast, non-pathogenic Listeria lacked LIPI-1, LIPI-2, and LIPI-3 genes, which could possibly be the cause of their non-pathogenicity despite their in vitro cell adhesion and invasion abilities. Thus, genetic determinants of Listeria do not necessarily predict cell adhesion and/or invasive ability in vitro. This study presents a comprehensive comparative genome-wide analysis of four Listeria strains, offering invaluable insights into the pathogenesis of the Listeria genus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.