ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
An international survey to better understand the current incidence, severity, and management of VOD/SOS.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This international questionnaire survey aimed to explore the current incidence, diagnostic policies, management, and outcomes of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) among healthcare providers involved in the management of these patients. A questionnaire was e-mailed to practitioners with an interest in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Of the respondents, 144 of 215 (67.0%) felt that early detection or diagnosis of VOD/SOS was difficult. Regarding diagnostic criteria, 142 (66.1%) already declared using the 2023 EBMT refined criteria. Most respondents (163/215, 75.8%) found these recent refined EBMT criteria useful for diagnosis, and 193 (89.8%) found the severity criteria easy to use. The major risk factors identified for VOD/SOS were a second allo-HCT (41.4%), pre-existing liver disease (54.9%), and prior use of antibody-drug conjugates (49.8%). Preferences for starting VOD/SOS treatment varied, with 61 (28.4%) preferring initiating therapy at a mild stage, and 122 (56.7%) preferring the moderate stage. In summary, this survey provided valuable insight into the challenges and opportunities of the identification and management of VOD/SOS. By improving current knowledge and increasing collaboration among healthcare professionals, early detection, management, and clinical outcomes for patients with this potentially serious complication can also be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39375526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.