ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of optimized ensemble machine learning-based prediction models for wire electrical discharge machining processes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CrayStack: a simplified crayfish optimization driven stacking ensemble for prediction of machining quality characteristics under data scarcity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Determining Material Removal and Electrode Wear in Electric Discharge Machining with a Generalist Machine Learning Framework.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An inclusive parametric study for performance improvement in WEDM process of pure titanium using Naive Bayes classifier.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes development of optimized heterogeneous ensemble models for prediction of responses based on given sets of input parameters for wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) processes, which have found immense applications in many of the present-day manufacturing industries because of their ability to generate complicated 2D and 3D profiles on hard-to-machine engineering materials. These ensembles are developed combining predictions of the three base models, i.e. random forest, support vector machine and ridge regression. These three base models are first framed utilizing the training datasets, providing predictions for all the responses under consideration. Based on these predictions, two optimization problems are formulated for each of the responses, while minimizing root mean squared error and mean absolute error, for subsequent development of two optimized ensembles whose predictions are the weighted sum of the predictions of the base models. The prediction performance of all the five models is ascertained through nine statistical metrics, after which a cumulative quality loss-based multi-response signal-to-noise (MRSN) ratio for each model is computed, for each of the responses, where a higher MRSN ratio indicates greater accuracy in prediction. This study is conducted using two experimental datasets of WEDM process. Overall, the optimized ensemble models having higher MRSN ratios than the base models are indicated to deliver better prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.