ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of Paecilomyces lilacinus and Bacillus pumilus on stem nematode and rhizosphere bacterial communities of sweet potato.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, synthesis, nematicidal activity, and preliminary mechanism of pyrimidine derivatives through the scaffold hopping strategy.Pest management science · 2026Article
- DecodingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Roles of Bacillus spp. in Sustainable Agriculture: Advances in Biocontrol, Omics, and Ecological Applications.Microbial ecology · 2026Review
- Impact of nitrogen fertilization on soil microbial diversity, its mediated enzyme activities, and stem nematode population in sweet potato fields.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem nematode (Ditylenchus destructor Thorne) is considered one of the most economically devastating species affecting sweet potato production. Biocontrol offers a sustainable strategy for nematode control. This study conducted a pot experiment to evaluate the biocontrol efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus CS-Z and Bacillus pumilus Y-26 against the stem nematode, as well as to examine their influence on the bacterial communities in the sweet potato rhizosphere. The findings indicated that B.pumilus Y-26 and P.lilacinus CS-Z exhibited respective suppression rates of 82.9% and 85.1% against the stem nematode, while also stimulating sweet potato plant growth. Both high-throughput sequencing and Biolog analysis revealed distinct impacts of the treatments on the bacterial communities. At the phylum level, B.pumilus Y-26 enhanced the abundance of Actinobacteria but reduced the abundance of Cyanobacteria, with P.lilacinus CS-Z exhibiting similar effects. Additionally, the treatment with B.pumilus Y-26 resulted in increased abundances of Crossiella, Gaiella, Bacillus, and Streptomyces at the genus level, while the treatment with P.lilacinus CS-Z showed increased abundances of Crossiella and Streptomyces. In contrast, the abundance of Pseudarthrobacter was reduced in the treatment with B.pumilus Y-26. Conversely, the application of the nematicide fosthiazate exhibited minor influence on the bacterial community. The findings indicated that the application of P.lilacinus CS-Z and B.pumilus Y-26 led to an increase in the relative abundances of beneficial microorganisms, including Gaiella, Bacillus, and Streptomyces, in the rhizosphere soil. In conclusion, P.lilacinus CS-Z and B.pumilus Y-26 demonstrated their potential as environmentally friendly biocontrol agents for managing stem nematode disease of sweet potato.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.