ArticleScientific reports2024
3D X-ray microscope acts as an accurate and effective equipment of pathological diagnosis in craniofacial imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D reconstruction and etching profile simulation for wiggling active area effect in dynamic random access memory manufacturing.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Genetic architecture of craniofacial morphogenesis: roles ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Craniofacial structure and dental hard tissue used to be researched on by traditional imaging tools such as light microscope, electron microscope and micro-CT. Due to the limitations of imaging principle, resolution and 3D rendering reconstruction technique, traditional imaging tools are constrained for presenting fine structure and precise measurements. Here a brand-new imaging equipment-3D X-ray microscope is introduced to realize a more efficient scanning by demonstrating the comparison of the craniofacial structures and dental hard tissue of diabetes and normal DBA mouse. To explore a higher resolution, more efficient imaging measurement and 3D reconstruction method on craniofacial structure and dental hard tissue. The study included 12 DBA mice which were divided into two groups (control group and diabetes group). The heads were separated and scanned by 3D X-ray microscope, after which regions of interest were selected, followed by measurement and 3D reconstruction based on microscope attached software Dragonfly pro©. Hemi-mandibles were collected for enamel mineral density assessment supported by QRM-MicroCT-HA phantom. Data was submitted to paired t-tests at a 95% confidence level. The automatic assessed enamel thickness of diabetes mice decreased on average, whereas the rest of manual measurements and automatic assessed density showed no statistical difference. We constructed HA phantom assisted enamel density procedure in Dragonfly software. Craniofacial structure and dental hard tissue were well-presented both in 2D slide and 3D reconstruction viewport by 3D X-ray microscope which can be routinely used as craniofacial structure and dental hard tissue imaging tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.