ArticleScientific reports2024
Bio-printing method as a novel approach to obtain a fibrin scaffold settled by limbal epithelial cells for corneal regeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Review
- Corneal Epithelial Tissue Engineering Strategy Based on Cell Viability Optimization: A Review and Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multiple Stem/Progenitor Cells Isolated from the Limbus.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD), based on autologous transplantation of the patient's stem cells, is one of the few medical stem cell therapies approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). It relies on isolating and culturing in vivo Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells (LESC) and then populating them on the fibrin substrate, creating a scaffold for corneal epithelial regeneration. Such a solution is then implanted into the patient's eye. The epithelial cell culture process is specific, and its results strongly depend on the initial cell seeding density. Achieving control of the density and repeatability of the process is a desirable aim and can contribute to the success of the therapy. The study aimed to test bioprinting as a potential technique to increase the control over LESCs seeding on a scaffold and improve process reproducibility. Cells were applied to 0.5 mm thick, flat, transparent fibrin substrates using extrusion bioprinting; the control was the traditional manual application of cells using a pipette. The use of 3D printer enabled uniform coverage of the scaffold surface, and LESCs density in printed lines was close to the targeted value. Moreover, printed cells had higher cell viability than those seeded traditionally (91.1 ± 8.2% vs 82.6 ± 12.8%). The growth rate of the epithelium was higher in bioprinted samples. In both methods, the epithelium had favorable phenotypic features (p63 + and CK14 +). 3D printing constitutes a promising approach in LSCD therapy. It provides favorable conditions for LESCs growth and process reproducibility. Its application may lead to reduced cell requirements, thereby to using fewer cells on lower passages, which will contribute to preserving LESCs proliferative potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.