ArticleEJNMMI reports2024
Prognostic significance of pretreatment PET parameters in inoperable, node-positive NSCLC patients with poor prognostic factors undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy: a single-institution retrospective study.
Article in EJNMMI reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNode-positive non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) present a challenge for treatment decisions, particularly in patients ineligible for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) due to poor performance status and compromised lung function. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment positron emission tomography (PET) parameters in high-risk patients undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 42 consecutive patients with inoperable node-positive NSCLC, who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2014 and 2021 at a single institution. Clinical, treatment-related, and [
resultsAfter a median follow-up of 47.1 months (range: 0.5-101.7), the median PFS and OS were 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-22.0), and 24.3 months (95% CI: 14.1-31.8). In univariable Cox regression analysis, significant predictors of PFS included receipt of salvage systemic treatment (p=0.007), SUVmax (p=0.032), and tMTV (p=0.038). Similarly, ECOG-PS (p=0.014), Histology (p=0.046), and tMTV (p=0.028) were significant predictors of OS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis (MVA) identified SUVmax as a significant predictor for PFS [HR: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.02-5.15); p=0.044]. For OS, ECOG-PS remained a significant prognosticator [HR: 3.53 (95% CI: 1.49-8.39); p=0.004], and tMTV approached significance [HR: 2.24 (95% CI: 0.95-5.26); p=0.065]. Furthermore, the high tMTV group exhibited a median PFS of 5.3 months [95% CI: 2.8-10.4], while the low tMTV group had a PFS of 15.2 months [95% CI: 10.1-33.5] (p=0.038, log-rank test). Median OS was 33.5 months [95% CI: 18.3-56.8] for tMTV ≤ 36.6 ml vs. 14.1 months [95% CI: 8.1-27.2] for tMTV > 36.6 ml (p=0.028, log-rank test).
conclusionPretreatment PET parameters, especially tMTV, hold promise as prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy. The study highlights the potential of PET metrics as biomarkers for patient stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.