ArticleArchives of microbiology2024
Impact of acidic and alkaline conditions on Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii interactions and their biofilms.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Acidic and alkaline conditions enhance Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin pore formation and cytotoxicity.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides and ESKAPEE Pathogens: A New Frontier in the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Amuc_1100 alleviates HFD-induced hepatic lipid accumulation via gut microbiota in zebrafish: insights from the role of intestinal 14-3-3β/α-A.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Peptide-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: A pH-Triggered Controlled Release against Biofilms.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial biofilms pose significant challenges due to their association with antibiotic resistance, metabolic adaptation, and survival under harsh conditions. Among notable pathogens forming biofilms, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii are concerning pathogens in nosocomial settings. However, their behaviour under acidic (pH 4.5) and alkaline (pH10.5) conditions, especially in co-culture setups, remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates these aspects, by examining growth rates, biofilm formation, pH shifts, phenotypic analysis, and gene expression profiles. The results showed A. baumannii exhibited reduced growth and biofilm formation at pH 4.5, while S. aureus showed slow growth and low biofilm formation at pH10.5 in mono-cultures. S. aureus leaned towards an acidic pH (6-6.5), whereas A. baumannii shifted towards an alkaline pH (8-9). In co-culture environments, growth rates and biofilm formation increased across all pH conditions, converging towards a neutral pH over time. Phenotypic motility assays indicated that A. baumannii exhibited greater motility in alkaline conditions, while S. aureus showed increased staphyloxanthin production under acidic conditions. Gene expression analyses revealed that the fibronectin-binding protein A (FnbA) and N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase (icaA) genes, responsible for initial attachment during biofilm formation, were highly expressed in acidic co-culture condition but poorly expressed in alkaline condition. In A. baumannii, the outer membrane protein A (OmpA) gene associated with adhesion and virulence, was upregulated in co-culture. The LuxR gene involved in quorum sensing was upregulated in acidic conditions and poorly expressed at pH 10.5. This study elucidates the metabolic adaptability and biofilm formation tendencies of S. aureus towards acidic conditions and A. baumannii towards alkaline conditions, providing insights for better management of biofilm-related infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39375235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.