Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375183›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Rural-urban and regional variations in aspects of caregiving, support services and caregiver health in the USA: evidence from a national survey.

Steven A Cohen, Neelam H Ahmed, Kerri A Ellis, Hayley Lindsey, Caitlin C Nash, Mary L Greaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Urbanicity and Disparities in the Functional and Physical Abilities of Older Adults Using the Health and Retirement Study: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven A CohenDepartment of Public Health, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA steven_cohen@uri.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0028-2277
Neelam H AhmedSchool of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Kerri A EllisCollege of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Hayley LindseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island College of Health Sciences, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Caitlin C NashDepartment of Public Health, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Mary L GreaneyDepartment of Public Health, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-920X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDue to substantial regional variability in available caregiving services and supports, culture and health status among informal caregivers in the USA, the study objective was to explore how rural-urban differences in aspects of caregiving-caregiving intensity, distance to care recipient, caregiver burden, caregiver health and caregiving support-vary by US Census region (Northeast, South, Midwest and West) after accounting for other social determinants of health.

designThis study was a secondary analysis of multiwave, cross-sectional study data.

settingThe data were collected on a representative sample of informal, unpaid caregivers to older adults.

participantsA sample of n=3551 informal caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving identified by older adult care recipients from waves 1 (2011) and 5 (2015) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were caregiving intensity (provided support for/with the number of activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADL (IADLs)) caregiver assisted with, hours of caregiving per month), caregiver burden (physical, emotional and financial), support services sought (types and total number), caregivers' self-reported health and health status (individual comorbidities and a total number of comorbidities). Analyses were stratified by US Census region and rural-urban status, as defined by the US Census Bureau, of census tract of caregiver residence.

resultsUrban caregivers provided higher levels of ADL support in the Northeast (beta=0.19, 95% CI 0.03, 0.35) and West (beta=0.15, 95% CI 0.05,0.26) regions. Urban caregivers provided significantly higher levels of ADL support (p=0.020), IADL support (p=0.033) and total ADLs plus IADLs (p=0.013) than rural caregivers. Caregivers living in the South had higher amounts of monthly hours spent caregiving, ADL support, IADL support and combined ADLs plus IADLs and were more likely to have obesity, report poor or fair health, have heart conditions and experience emotional difficulty from caregiving (all p<0.001).

conclusionsStudy findings underscore caregiving's multifaceted and complex nature and identify important urban-rural and regional differences in caregiving in the USA. Healthcare providers and healthcare organisations can have an important role in identifying and mitigating the negative impacts of caregiving on caregivers' overall health. Interventions and support should be tailored to caregivers' demographic backgrounds, addressing regional differences.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCaregiversHealth StatusRural PopulationSocial SupportUrban PopulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiver BurdenCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial Determinants of Healthcaregiversepidemiologygeriatric medicinehealth equitysurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39375183
PMCPMC11459326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.