Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375016›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Nonkin interactions between Bacillus subtilis soil isolates limit the spread of swarming deficient cheats.

Katarina Belcijan Pandur, Barbara Kraigher, Ana Tomac, Polonca Stefanic, Ines Mandic Mulec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katarina Belcijan PandurDepartment of Microbiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Barbara KraigherDepartment of Microbiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ana TomacDepartment of Microbiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Polonca StefanicDepartment of Microbiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ines Mandic MulecDepartment of Microbiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

ARIS J4-4550Slovenian Research Agency P4-0116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperative behaviours in human, animal, and even microbial societies are vulnerable to exploitation. Kin discrimination has been hypothesized to help stabilize cooperation. However, the mechanisms that sustain cooperative behaviour remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the role of kin discrimination in limiting the spread of cheats in adjoining populations during surfactant-dependent cooperative swarming over surfaces using the bacterium Bacillus subtilis as a model organism. We show that mixing surfactant secreting cooperators and cheats that do not produce surfactants at 1:1 initial ratio quickly leads to cooperation collapse. However, when such common swarms encounter nonkin B. subtilis swarms, the proportion of the surfactant nonproducers decreases, suggesting that kinship dependent interactions may limit cheats' advantage in an adjoining population. To further validate this finding, we subjected wild-type cooperators to multiple transient encounters with kin and nonkin swarms over 20 cycles of experimental evolution. The evolved populations exposed to nonkin swarms less frequently contained defective swarming phenotypes compared to those encountering kin swarms. Altogether, our results support the prediction that the spread of cheats in an adjoining bacterial population is impeded by kin discrimination interactions, which might have a role in stabilizing cooperative behaviour in evolving populations.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisMicrobial InteractionsSoil MicrobiologySurface-Active AgentsSurface-Active AgentsBacillus subtilischeatscooperationexperimental evolutionkin discriminationpublic goodsswarming

Identifiers

PMID39375016
PMCPMC11523185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.