Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374980›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Making decisions about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a qualitative interview study of a sample of women in the UK.

Heather James, Sophie Smith, Dheeraj Rai, Iryna Culpin, Katrina Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Patterns of antidepressant prescribing around pregnancy: a descriptive analysis using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. First trimester antidepressant use and miscarriage: a population-based cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather JamesCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol. heather.james@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0009-3982-4529
Sophie SmithCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0002-1248-5477
Dheeraj RaiCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0002-7239-3523
Iryna CulpinFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London; honorary research fellow, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0001-5086-987X
Katrina TurnerCentre for Academic Mental Health; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-2918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of pregnant women now take antidepressants. Many pregnant women experience decisional conflict when deciding whether to take antidepressants, but little is known about the attitudes and experiences that influence these decisions.

aimTo explore the attitudes and experiences influencing women's decisions about antenatal antidepressant use. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a sample of UK women who experienced antenatal depression or took antidepressants antenatally within the preceding 3 years.

methodRecruitment adverts were placed by a perinatal mental health charity and on parenting forums and social media platforms, resulting in a convenience sample. Interview data were coded and analysed with thematic analysis using QSR NVivo.

resultsTwenty-two women were interviewed; one-half had taken antidepressants during pregnancy. Most women had concerns about adverse effects and viewed antidepressants as adjunctive to non-pharmacological treatments, which were reported as difficult to access. Some women reported that professional advice was insufficiently detailed. Women described the need to cope with their symptoms, their baby, and existing responsibilities, and related their decisions to their perceived ability to cope. This perception was influenced by physical and emotional challenges relating to pregnancy. Women's decisions were influenced by their previous experiences and by the perceived societal expectations placed on pregnant women.

conclusionDecision making is a complex and dynamic process, personal to each woman's circumstances. Perceived ability to cope is an important factor in decision making. Detailed information should be offered to women for support with decision making in relation to antenatal medication use.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDecision MakingDepressionPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomAntidepressive Agentsantenatal depressionantidepressantsdecision makingmedicationperinatal mental healthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39374980
PMCPMC11966528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.