ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025
Making decisions about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a qualitative interview study of a sample of women in the UK.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized controlled trial of an electronic patient decision aid (PDA) for decision-making around antidepressant use in pregnancy.Archives of women's mental health · 2026Trial
- Patterns of antidepressant prescribing around pregnancy: a descriptive analysis using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- First trimester antidepressant use and miscarriage: a population-based cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing number of pregnant women now take antidepressants. Many pregnant women experience decisional conflict when deciding whether to take antidepressants, but little is known about the attitudes and experiences that influence these decisions.
aimTo explore the attitudes and experiences influencing women's decisions about antenatal antidepressant use. DESIGN AND
settingA qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a sample of UK women who experienced antenatal depression or took antidepressants antenatally within the preceding 3 years.
methodRecruitment adverts were placed by a perinatal mental health charity and on parenting forums and social media platforms, resulting in a convenience sample. Interview data were coded and analysed with thematic analysis using QSR NVivo.
resultsTwenty-two women were interviewed; one-half had taken antidepressants during pregnancy. Most women had concerns about adverse effects and viewed antidepressants as adjunctive to non-pharmacological treatments, which were reported as difficult to access. Some women reported that professional advice was insufficiently detailed. Women described the need to cope with their symptoms, their baby, and existing responsibilities, and related their decisions to their perceived ability to cope. This perception was influenced by physical and emotional challenges relating to pregnancy. Women's decisions were influenced by their previous experiences and by the perceived societal expectations placed on pregnant women.
conclusionDecision making is a complex and dynamic process, personal to each woman's circumstances. Perceived ability to cope is an important factor in decision making. Detailed information should be offered to women for support with decision making in relation to antenatal medication use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.