Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374577›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Guideline concordance of aspirin use for primary prevention in adult outpatients.

Naina Chipalkatti, Geoffrey D Barnes, Linda Bashaw, Adam Davie, Jennifer J Griggs, Molly Harrod, Jacob E Kurlander, Christine Medaugh, Rebeca Packard, Corey Powell and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Patient Use and Perceptions of Primary Prevention Aspirin in the United States.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Naina ChipalkattiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Geoffrey D BarnesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Linda BashawDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Adam DavieDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jennifer J GriggsDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-1598-4562
Molly HarrodCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jacob E KurlanderInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Christine MedaughDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rebeca PackardHealth Information Technology & Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Corey PowellConsulting for Statistics, Computing & Analytics Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-6756-3524
Suman SoodDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Elizabeth SprangerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Sarah E VordenbergDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-9759
Jordan K SchaeferDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-386X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractRecent guidelines have recommended a reduced role for primary prevention aspirin use, which is associated with an increased bleeding risk. This study aimed to characterize guideline-discordant aspirin use among adults in a community care setting. As part of a quality improvement initiative, patients at 1 internal medicine and 1 family medicine clinic affiliated with an academic hospital were sent an electronic survey. Patients were included if they were at least 40 years old, had a primary care provider at the specified site, and were seen in the last year. Patients were excluded if they had an indication for aspirin other than primary prevention. Responses were collected from 15 February to 16 March 2022. Analyses were performed to identify predictors of primary prevention aspirin use and predictors of guideline-discordant aspirin use; aspirin users and nonusers were compared using Fisher exact test, independent samples t tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Of the 1460 patients sent a survey, 668 (45.8%) responded. Of the respondents, 132 (24.1%) reported aspirin use that was confirmed to be for primary prevention. Overall, 46.2% to 58.3% of primary prevention aspirin users were potentially taking aspirin, contrary to the guideline recommendations. Predictors of discordant aspirin use included a history of diabetes mellitus and medication initiation by a primary care provider. In conclusion, primary prevention aspirin use may be overutilized and discordant with recent guideline recommendations for approximately half of the patients, suggesting a need for aspirin deimplementation. These efforts may be best focused at the primary care level.

Indexed as

AspirinPrimary PreventionAdultAgedFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesAspirin

Identifiers

PMID39374577
PMCPMC11697097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.