Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374459›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2024

Medicare Part D Protected-Class Policy Is Associated With Lower Drug Rebates.

Pragya Kakani, Michael Anne Kyle, Amitabh Chandra, Luca Maini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pragya KakaniPragya Kakani (pka4006@med.cornell.edu), Cornell University, New York, New York.
Michael Anne KyleMichael Anne Kyle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amitabh ChandraAmitabh Chandra, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Luca MainiLuca Maini, Harvard University.

Funding

NBER Training Program in Aging and Health EconomicsT32AG000186 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI CUTLER, DAVID M, FINKELSTEIN, AMY N. · 1989 to 2024
$9.6M
Patient Administrative Burden in Cancer Care DeliveryR00CA277367 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Anne Kyle · 2024 to 2026
$747k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA277367NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicare Part D does not allow plans to exclude drugs in six protected classes from their formularies, which may limit plans' ability to negotiate rebates and lead to higher spending. We estimated the association between protected-class status, US-level estimated rebates, and formulary coverage during the period 2011-19. We found that protected classes indeed had significantly lower exclusion rates in Medicare Part D during this period relative to nonprotected classes, and this difference was larger than the corresponding difference in commercial plans. US-level average rebates grew 22.5 percentage points less in protected than in nonprotected classes during 2011-19, a period when formulary exclusions increased. Relative to nonprotected classes, US-level average rebates in protected classes were especially low among drugs with high Medicare market share. These results suggest that Medicare Part D protected-class policy may reduce rebates.

Indexed as

Medicare Part DDrug CostsFormularies as TopicHealth PolicyHumansInsurance CoveragePrescription DrugsUnited StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID39374459
PMCPMC12088690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.