Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374458›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2024

Institutional Special Needs Plans In Nursing Homes: Substantial Enrollment Growth But Low Availability, 2006-21.

Amanda C Chen, Joseph G P Hnath, David C Grabowski

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda C ChenAmanda C. Chen (amandachen@g.harvard.edu), Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Joseph G P HnathJoseph G. P. Hnath, Harvard University.
David C GrabowskiDavid C. Grabowski, Harvard University.

Funding

Tradeoffs in the Design of Public Long-Term Care BenefitsP01AG032952 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Leila S. Agha · 2009 to 2026
$39.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Institutional Special Needs Plans (I-SNPs) are a type of Medicare Advantage (MA) plan designed for long-term residents of nursing homes or those who live in the community but need a nursing home level of care. I-SNPs provide for on-site nurse practitioners in nursing homes to help improve primary care, care planning, and care coordination. Our study was the first to undertake a nationwide descriptive analysis of the I-SNP market. The share of long-stay nursing home residents enrolled in I-SNPs quadrupled from 2006 to 2021, from 2.2 percent to 8.8 percent. Despite this growth, nearly 70 percent of nursing homes did not have any residents enrolled in I-SNPs in 2021, and in more than 60 percent of US counties, there were no I-SNPs available. Nearly 94 percent of long-stay nursing home residents who were enrolled in I-SNPs in 2021 were eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. More research is needed to understand why I-SNPs enter certain markets and why long-stay nursing home residents choose to enroll in them; to assess I-SNP enrollment barriers; and to compare hospital admission rates and quality outcomes among long-stay nursing home residents by I-SNP enrollment status. Increased understanding of I-SNPs could inform policies to address long-standing concerns about the quality of care in nursing homes.

Indexed as

Medicare Part CNursing HomesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMedicaidUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39374458
PMCPMC11722931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.