Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374397›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The topology and geometry of neural representations.

Baihan Lin, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. InputDSA : Demixing then comparing recurrent and externally driven dynamics.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The topology of representational geometry.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baihan LinDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-5509
Nikolaus KriegeskorteZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0001-7433-9005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question for neuroscience is how to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. An ideal characterization should distinguish different functional regions with robustness to noise and idiosyncrasies of individual brains that do not correspond to computational differences. Previous studies have characterized brain representations by their representational geometry, which is defined by the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), a summary statistic that abstracts from the roles of individual neurons (or responses channels) and characterizes the discriminability of stimuli. Here, we explore a further step of abstraction: from the geometry to the topology of brain representations. We propose topological representational similarity analysis, an extension of representational similarity analysis that uses a family of geotopological summary statistics that generalizes the RDM to characterize the topology while de-emphasizing the geometry. We evaluate this family of statistics in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for model selection using both simulations and functional MRI (fMRI) data. In the simulations, the ground truth is a data-generating layer representation in a neural network model and the models are the same and other layers in different model instances (trained from different random seeds). In fMRI, the ground truth is a visual area and the models are the same and other areas measured in different subjects. Results show that topology-sensitive characterizations of population codes are robust to noise and interindividual variability and maintain excellent sensitivity to the unique representational signatures of different neural network layers and brain regions.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalBrain MappingComputer SimulationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronscognitive neurosciencecomputational neurosciencerepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39374397
PMCPMC11494346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.