Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374349›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2025

How compactness affects long bone resistance to compression-An investigation into the rhinoceros humerus.

Cyril Etienne, Jérémie Viot, Peter J Watson, Michael J Fagan, Alexandra Houssaye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cyril EtienneMécanismes Adaptatifs et évolution (MECADEV), UMR 7179, MNHN, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4548-2934
Jérémie ViotMécanismes Adaptatifs et évolution (MECADEV), UMR 7179, MNHN, CNRS, Paris, France.
Peter J WatsonBiomedical Engineering Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Michael J FaganBiomedical Engineering Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Alexandra HoussayeMécanismes Adaptatifs et évolution (MECADEV), UMR 7179, MNHN, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-5545

Funding

ERC-2016-STG-715300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The functional signal of bone internal structure has been widely studied. Isolated form-function relationships have often been assumed from the observation of presumed morphofunctional relationships, but have never been truly tested. Indeed, distinct bone microanatomical feature co-evolve in response to various constraints that are difficult to detangle. This study tested for the first time the impact of various microanatomical parameters taken one by one, plus some in pairs, on bone strength under compression using biomechanical modelling. We carried out finite element analyses on humerus models, obtained from a white rhinoceros, with different heterogeneous internal structures, and analysed the magnitude and distribution of von Mises stresses. These tests validated earlier hypotheses of form-function relationships about the greater resistance to compression provided by the thickening of the cortex and the filling of the medullary area by trabecular bone and highlighted the stronger impact of increasing trabecular bone compactness than of avoiding an open medullary cavity. By making it possible to estimate the relative impact of each parameter and of combinations of microanatomical features, they also showed the more limited impact of the trabecular bone compactness in the epiphyses to resist compression, and the fact that microanatomical changes of opposite but of similar amplitude impact can compensate each other, but that the impact of the sum of two negative microanatomical changes far exceeds the sum of the impacts of each of the two changes taken separately. These results contribute to a better understanding of bone adaptation and form-function relationships so that they later can be used with confidence for palaeobiological inferences on fossil specimens, contributing to a better understanding of skeletal evolution during the evolutionary history of vertebrates. They also highlight the potential of taking internal structure into account in the bone biomechanical analyses. In addition, they can be used in bioinspiration to design resistant structures subjected to compression.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisHumerusPerissodactylaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCompressive StrengthStress, Mechanicalbiomechanical modellingbone adaptationcompactnesscompression

Identifiers

PMID39374349
PMCPMC11684376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.