Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374339›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2024

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Sweden vs. Finland: benefits of population-wide screening.

Matti T Laine, Kevin Mani, Kim Gunnarsson, Anders Wanhainen, Reijo Sund, Maarit Venermo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Abdominal Aorta Remodeling in Hypertensive Patients: The Campania Salute Network.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matti T LaineDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0003-2218-3282
Kevin ManiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-5351
Kim GunnarssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anders WanhainenDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-8726
Reijo SundInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Surgery, Kuopio Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-8117
Maarit VenermoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8814-0988

Funding

Finnish National Funding for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn 2006, screening of 65-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was started in Sweden. Decline in aneurysm-related mortality has been reported since, but aneurysm incidence has been diminishing globally. Neighbouring Finland with similar population structure and health care system has no AAA screening programme. The aim of this study was to compare incidence and results of AAA repair in Sweden and Finland to differentiate the effect of screening from other changes in the epidemiology and treatment of AAA.

methodsAll repairs for intact AAA (iAAA) or ruptured AAA (rAAA) from 1998 to 2017 were identified from national registers, and mortality data for these patients were collected.

resultsA total of 15 927 operations for iAAA were performed in Sweden and 6933 in Finland. In Sweden, the yearly operation volume increased after introduction of screening. Both countries showed a decrease in number of rAAA operations, but the decrease was more pronounced in Sweden. Sweden had a higher proportion of all AAA repairs because of rupture in the start of the study but by the end, the proportions were similar in both countries. Long-term survival improved for 65-79-old men in Sweden after start of screening.

conclusionsThis study reveals improvements in results of AAA repair in Sweden. A decrease in rAAA repair and increase in iAAA repair were evident after AAA screening was started in 2006 and resulted in better outcomes. These changes are likely the result of AAA screening as they cannot be seen in neighbouring Finland that is lacking an AAA screening programme.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFinlandHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSwedenAbdominal aortic aneurysmCardiovascular mortalityEpidemiologyPopulation screeningRegister studyVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID39374339
PMCPMC11578644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.