Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374302›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Enhancing stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy dose prediction for bulky lung cancer: A multi-scale dilated network approach with scale-balanced structure loss.

Lei Huang, Xianshu Gao, Yue Li, Feng Lyu, Yan Gao, Yun Bai, Mingwei Ma, Siwei Liu, Jiayan Chen, Xueying Ren and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lei HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xianshu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Feng LyuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yun BaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mingwei MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Siwei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiayan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xueying RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shiyu ShangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuanfeng DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Cordell Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7244422Beijing Natural Science Foundation L232126National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (High Quality Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital) 2023HQ11National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Interdepartmental Research Project of Peking University First Hospital) 2023IR45National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271771Peking University First Hospital Seed Foundation 2024SF81
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePartial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy (P-SABR) effectively treats bulky lung cancer; however, the planning process for P-SABR requires repeated dose calculations. To improve planning efficiency, we proposed a novel deep learning method that utilizes limited data to accurately predict the three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution of the P-SABR plan for bulky lung cancer.

methodsWe utilized data on 74 patients diagnosed with bulky lung cancer who received P-SABR treatment. The patient dataset was randomly divided into a training set (51 plans) with augmentation, validation set (7 plans), and testing set (16 plans). We devised a 3D multi-scale dilated network (MD-Net) and integrated a scale-balanced structure loss into the loss function. A comparative analysis with a classical network and other advanced networks with multi-scale analysis capabilities and other loss functions was conducted based on the dose distributions in terms of the axial view, average dose scores (ADSs), and average absolute differences of dosimetric indices (AADDIs). Finally, we analyzed the predicted dosimetric indices against the ground-truth values and compared the predicted dose-volume histogram (DVH) with the ground-truth DVH.

resultsOur proposed dose prediction method for P-SABR plans for bulky lung cancer demonstrated strong performance, exhibiting a significant improvement in predicting multiple indicators of regions of interest (ROIs), particularly the gross target volume (GTV). Our network demonstrated increased accuracy in most dosimetric indices and dose scores in different ROIs. The proposed loss function significantly enhanced the predictive performance of the dosimetric indices. The predicted dosimetric indices and DVHs were equivalent to the ground-truth values.

conclusionOur study presents an effective model based on limited datasets, and it exhibits high accuracy in the dose prediction of P-SABR plans for bulky lung cancer. This method has potential as an automated tool for P-SABR planning and can help optimize treatments and improve planning efficiency.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleOrgans at RiskPrognosisbulky lung cancerdeep learningpartial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapythree‐dimensional dose prediction

Identifiers

PMID39374302
PMCPMC11712318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.