ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Parasitic Capacitance in High-Density Neural Electrode Arrays: Sources and Evaluation Methods.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for characterizing neural electrodes.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2026Article
- [Study on the electric field transmission characteristics of conducted-electrode tumor treating fields].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to identify sources of parasitic capacitance in high-density neural electrode arrays and to provide an approach for evaluating their associated capacitance values. We also represent the effect of parasitic capacitance on the electrochemical properties of electrodes.
methodsElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and voltage transient (VT) measurements were employed to assess the parasitic capacitance of a 16-channel ultramicro-sized electrode array (UMEA) (8 × 25 µm
resultsThe capacitive leakage currents and charge during CV measurements were not significant, however, during current pulsing 34% underestimation of the maximum charge injection capacity corresponded to capacitive leakage. Capacitive leakage during EIS resulted in an underestimation of the electrode impedance at frequencies >1.5 kHz.
conclusionThe electrode design and insulation thickness can play a significant role in determining the amount of capacitive leakage during current pulsing and EIS at higher frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE: Determining the sources and levels of capacitive leakage current in high-density neural electrode arrays, enables us to correct the measured value for the leakage current and thus estimate the electrode impedance and stimulation thresholds more accurately. This study highlights the importance of electrode design in developing high-density arrays with minimum capacitive leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.