ArticlePloS one2024
Definition of a coordinate system for multi-modal images of the temporal bone and inner ear.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical appraisal of "Diagnostic value of the inner ear computed tomography measurements in detecting congenital sensorineural hearing loss: a comparative study".European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparison of Low-Dose, Standard-Dose, and High-Definition CBCT Protocols for STL Reconstruction Accuracy in Digital Bone Scaffold Workflows.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A deep learning framework for the localization of landmarks on the lateral semi circular canals.PloS one · 2026Article
- Optimizing spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear MRI: comparison of different geometry-preserving co-registration approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe position and orientation of the head is maintained to be relatively similar during the CT / MR imaging process. However, the position / orientation dissimilarities present in the resulting images between patients, or between different scans of the same patient, do not allow for direct comparison of the images themselves or features / metrics extracted from them. This paper introduces a method of defining a coordinate system which is consistent between patients and modalities (CT and MR) for images of the temporal bone, using easily identifiable landmarks within the semicircular canals.
methodsCone Beam CT and high resolution MRI (T2) images of the temporal bone from 20 patients with no cochlear or temporal bone pathology in either modality were obtained. Four landmarks within the semicircular canals were defined that can be identified in both modalities. A coordinate system was defined using these landmarks. Reproducibility of landmark selection was assessed using intra- and inter-rater reliability (for three expert raters and two repeats of the landmark selection). Accuracy of the coordinate system was determined by comparing the coordinates of two additional landmarks in CT and MR images after their conversion to the proposed coordinate system.
resultsIntraclass Correlation Coefficients at a 95% level of confidence showed significant agreement within and between raters as well as between modalities. The differences between selections, raters, and modalities (as measured using mean, standard deviation, and maximum) were low and acceptable for clinical applications.
conclusionThe proposed coordinate system is suited for use in images of the temporal bone and inner ear. Its multi-modal nature enables the coordinate system to be used in tasks such as image co-registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.