Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Entity Linking for real-time geolocation of natural disasters from social network posts.

Gaëtan Caillaut, Samuel Auclair, Cécile Gracianne, Nathalie Abadie, Guillaume Touya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaëtan CaillautBRGM, Department of Risks and Prevention, BRGM, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6256-3402
Samuel AuclairBRGM, Department of Risks and Prevention, BRGM, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3490-668X
Cécile GracianneBRGM, Department of Risks and Prevention, BRGM, Orléans, France.
Nathalie AbadieLASTIG, Univ Gustave Eiffel, IGN-ENSG, Saint-Mandé, France.
Guillaume TouyaLASTIG, Univ Gustave Eiffel, IGN-ENSG, Champs-sur-Marne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-6903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a fast kinetic natural disaster occurs, it is crucial that crisis managers quickly understand the extent of the situation, especially through the development of "big picture" maps. For many years, great efforts have been made to use social networks to help build this situational awareness. While there are many models for automatically extracting information from posts, the difficulty remains in detecting and geolocating this information on the fly so that it can be placed on maps. Whilst most of the work carried out to date on this subject has been based on data in English, we tackle the problem of detecting and geolocating natural disasters from French messages posted on the Twitter platform (now renamed "X"). To this end, we first build an appropriate dataset comprised of documents from the French Wikipedia corpus, the dataset from the CAp 2017 challenge, and a homemade annotated Twitter dataset extracted during French natural disasters. We then developed an Entity-Linking pipeline in adequacy with our end-application use case: real-time prediction and peak resiliency. We show that despite these two additional constraints, our system's performances are on par with state-of-the-art systems. Moreover, the entities geolocated by our model show a strong coherence with the spatiotemporal signature of the natural disasters considered, which suggests that it could usefully contribute to automatic social network analysis for crisis managers.

Indexed as

Natural DisastersSocial MediaSocial NetworkingFranceHumans

Identifiers

PMID39374247
PMCPMC11457996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.