Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374073›Full record

Observational studyJMIR medical education2024

Psychological Safety Competency Training During the Clinical Internship From the Perspective of Health Care Trainee Mentors in 11 Pan-European Countries: Mixed Methods Observational Study.

Irene Carrillo, Ivana Skoumalová, Ireen Bruus, Victoria Klemm, Sofia Guerra-Paiva, Bojana Knežević, Augustina Jankauskiene, Dragana Jocic, Susanna Tella, Sandra C Buttigieg and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Irene CarrilloDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6981-7284
Ivana SkoumalováDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-4158
Ireen BruusTartu Health Care College, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0009-0000-4599-1918
Victoria KlemmWiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety (WiHelP), Wiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6197-9847
Sofia Guerra-PaivaPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4311-3799
Bojana KneževićUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-3775
Augustina JankauskienePediatric Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-7767-2102
Dragana JocicBENU Pharmacy, PHOENIX Group Serbia, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0002-6075-7641
Susanna TellaFaculty of Social and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4584-8852
Sandra C ButtigiegDepartment of Health Systems Management and Leadership, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Malta, Malta.ORCID 0000-0002-0572-2462
Einav SruloviciCheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1291-8284
Andrea Madarasová GeckováDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2993-3798
Kaja PõllusteInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-8871-1397
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety (WiHelP), Wiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-8674
Paulo SousaPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9502-6075
Marina OdalovicFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0002-3050-8361
José Joaquín MiraDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-083X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the field of research, psychological safety has been widely recognized as a contributing factor to improving the quality of care and patient safety. However, its consideration in the curricula and traineeship pathways of residents and health care students is scarce.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the extent to which health care trainees acquire psychological safety competencies during their internships in clinical settings and identify what measures can be taken to promote their learning.

methodsA mixed methods observational study based on a consensus conference and an open-ended survey among a sample of health care trainee mentors from health care institutions in a pan-European context was conducted. First, we administered an ad hoc questionnaire to assess the perceived degree of acquisition or implementation and significance of competencies (knowledge, attitudes, and skills) and institutional interventions in psychological safety. Second, we asked mentors to propose measures to foster among trainees those competencies that, in the first phase of the study, obtained an average acquisition score of <3.4 (scale of 1-5). A content analysis of the information collected was carried out, and the spontaneity of each category and theme was determined.

resultsIn total, 173 mentors from 11 pan-European countries completed the first questionnaire (response rate: 173/256, 67.6%), of which 63 (36.4%) participated in the second consultation. The competencies with the lowest acquisition level were related to warning a professional that their behavior posed a risk to the patient, managing their possible bad reaction, and offering support to a colleague who becomes a second victim. The mentors' proposals for improvement of this competency gap referred to training in communication skills and patient safety, safety culture, work climate, individual attitudes, a reference person for trainees, formal incorporation into the curricula of health care degrees and specialization pathways, specific systems and mechanisms to give trainees a voice, institutional risk management, regulations, guidelines and standards, supervision, and resources to support trainees. In terms of teaching methodology, the mentors recommended innovative strategies, many of them based on technological tools or solutions, including videos, seminars, lectures, workshops, simulation learning or role-playing with or without professional actors, case studies, videos with practical demonstrations or model situations, panel discussions, clinical sessions for joint analysis of patient safety incidents, and debriefings to set and discuss lessons learned.

conclusionsThis study sought to promote psychological safety competencies as a formal part of the training of future health care professionals, facilitating the translation of international guidelines into practice and clinical settings in the pan-European context.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyMentorsAdultCurriculumEuropeFemaleHumansMalePatient SafetyPsychological SafetySurveys and Questionnairesadverse eventeducationpatient safetyprofessional competencepsychological safetyspeaking up

Identifiers

PMID39374073
PMCPMC11494257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.