SynthesisJAMA network open2024
Cardiovascular Events After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in US Medicare beneficiaries.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Cardiotoxicity of T cell immunotherapies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- The New Cardio-Oncology Frontier in Hematologic Cancers: Cardiovascular Toxicities of CAR-T Cells and Bispecific T-Cell Engagers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Uro-Oncology Treatments-A Primer for the Clinician.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Care in Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Review and Integrated Systems-Based Approach from a UK Cardio-Oncology Centre of Excellence.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity according to the ESC definition in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cardiac Risk Without a Roadmap: Lack of Evidence-Based Guidance for Cardiovascular Toxicity of T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Temporal trends, cardiovascular complications, and outcomes in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy: a 6-year nationwide analysis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Vascular inflammation in patients undergoing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cells for haematologic malignancies: a call for cardiovascular surveillance.European heart journal · 2026Article
- CAR-T therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical prospects, potential, and strategies for cardiotoxicity management.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond Hyperglycemia: The Role of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment-related Cardiac Dysfunction.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Guarding the heart in the era of immunotherapies: insights for cardio-oncology practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity: from mechanisms to management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy-Associated Cardiotoxicity: Current Insights and Future Directions for Precision Cardio-Oncology.Cancers · 2025Review
- Cancer-Related Immune Therapies: Bidirectional Implications From Cardiotoxicity to Emerging Cardiovascular Therapeutics: JACC CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular complications of cellular immunotherapies and associated risk factors.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Immune cells and arrhythmias.Cardiovascular research · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular adverse events and outcomes after anti-BCMA CAR-T for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Role of Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy.Circulation reports · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular adverse effects of immunotherapy in cancer: insights and implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The frequency and clinical phenotypes of cardiotoxic events in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell recipients remain poorly understood given that landmark approval trials typically exclude patients with high-risk cardiovascular profiles and data from nontrial settings are scarce. Objective: To summarize the prevalence of adverse cardiovascular events among adults receiving CAR T-cell therapies for advanced hematologic malignant neoplasms. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from database inception until February 26, 2024. Study Selection: Observational studies were included if they comprised adult CAR T-cell recipients with advanced hematologic malignant neoplasms and if they systematically evaluated cardiovascular complications. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Extraction of prespecified parameters related to the patient population, study design, and clinical events was performed at the study level by 2 independent reviewers in accordance with the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. Meta-analysis of single proportions was conducted using random-effect models with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformations to calculate pooled prevalence estimates. Sensitivity analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models with logit transformations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, heart failure events, reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Results: Thirteen studies comprising 1528 CAR T-cell recipients (median [IQR] age, 61 [58.7-63.0] years; 1016 males [66%]; 80% patients with lymphoma) were included. The median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 487 (294-530) days. On random-effects meta-analysis, we observed a pooled prevalence of 0.66% (95% CI, 0.00%-2.28%) for ventricular arrhythmia, 7.79% (95% CI, 4.87%-11.27%) for supraventricular arrhythmia, 8.68% (95% CI, 2.26%-17.97%) for left ventricular dysfunction, 3.87% (95% CI, 1.77%-6.62%) for heart failure events, 0.62% (95% CI, 0.02%-1.74%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.63% (95% CI, 0.13%-1.38%) for cardiovascular death. The pooled prevalence of all-cause mortality was 30.01% (95% CI, 19.49%-41.68%). Sensitivity analyses generated similar findings. Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis found a low prevalence of ventricular arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death among CAR T-cell recipients over a short-term to midterm follow-up. Left ventricular dysfunction and supraventricular arrhythmia were the most commonly reported cardiovascular complications, suggesting that cardiovascular surveillance strategies should focus on decreases in ejection fraction and supraventricular arrhythmia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.