Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374016›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Rehabilitation Transition Program to Improve Community Participation Among Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rebecca M Bollinger, Melissa J Krauss, Emily K Somerville, Brianna M Holden, Gabrielle Blenden, Holly Hollingsworth, Audrey A Keleman, Alexandre Carter, Timothy D McBride, Abigail R Barker and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03485820 (COMPASS), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03485820 nacompletednot on this map

COMPASS: A Novel Transition Program to Reduce Disability After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2018 to 2024Enrolled185ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Hemorrhagic StrokeArmsCOMPASS, Stroke education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effects of nonpharmacological interventions on post-stroke quality of life: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebecca M BollingerProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Melissa J KraussProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Emily K SomervilleProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Brianna M HoldenProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Gabrielle BlendenProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Holly HollingsworthProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Audrey A KelemanProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Alexandre CarterDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Timothy D McBrideCenter for Advancing Health Services, Economics, and Policy Research, Institute for Public Health at Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Abigail R BarkerCenter for Advancing Health Services, Economics, and Policy Research, Institute for Public Health at Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Yan YanDepartment of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Susan L StarkProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
COMPASS: A NOVEL TRANSITION PROGRAM TO REDUCE DISABILITY AFTER STROKER01HD092398 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Lynn Stark · 2017 to 2026
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Interventions are needed to support the long-term needs of stroke survivors when they transition from inpatient rehabilitation to home, where they face new home and community environmental barriers. Objective: To compare the efficacy of a novel, enhanced rehabilitation transition program with attentional control to improve community participation and activity of daily living (ADL) performance and to reduce environmental barriers in the home and community after stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2b, parallel randomized clinical trial assessed patients 50 years or older who had experienced an acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage, were independent in ADLs before stroke, and planned to be discharged home. Patients were assessed at an inpatient rehabilitation facility in St Louis, Missouri, and their homes from January 9, 2018, to December 20, 2023. Intervention: Community Participation Transition after Stroke (COMPASS), including home modifications and strategy training. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was community participation (Reintegration to Normal Living Index). Secondary outcomes were daily activity performance (Stroke Impact Scale ADL domain and the In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation [I-HOPE] activity, performance, and satisfaction scores) and environmental barriers in the home (I-HOPE environmental barriers score). Results: A total of 185 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [9.0] years; 105 [56.8%] male) were randomized (85 to the COMPASS group and 100 to the control group). The COMPASS and control participants experienced similar improvements in community participation by 12 months, with no significant group (mean difference, 0.3; 95% CI, -4.6 to 5.2; P = .91) or group × time interaction (between-group differences in changes over time, 1.3; 95% CI, -7.1 to 9.6; P = .76) effects. Improvements in I-HOPE performance and satisfaction scores were greater for COMPASS participants than control participants at 12 months (between-group differences in changes for performance: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.01-0.77; P = .046; satisfaction: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.08-0.96; P = .02). The COMPASS participants had greater improvements for I-HOPE environmental barriers than the control participants (P = .003 for interaction), with the largest differences at 6 months (between-group differences in changes: -15.3; 95% CI -24.4 to -6.2). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of stroke survivors, participants in both groups experienced improvements in community participation. COMPASS participants had greater improvements in self-rated performance and satisfaction with performing daily activities as well as a greater reduction in environmental barriers than control participants. COMPASS reduced environmental barriers and improved performance of daily activities for stroke survivors as they transitioned from inpatient rehabilitation to home. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03485820.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCommunity ParticipationStroke RehabilitationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMissouriStrokeSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID39374016
PMCPMC11581659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.