Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374015›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Circulating Tumor Cell Count and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Amir Goldkorn, Catherine Tangen, Melissa Plets, Daniel Bsteh, Tong Xu, Jacek K Pinski, Sue Ingles, Timothy Junius Triche, Gary R MacVicar, Daniel A Vaena and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Emerging Therapeutic Strategies in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Artificial Intelligence for CELLSEARCH Image Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Amir GoldkornDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
Catherine TangenSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Melissa PletsSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Daniel BstehDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
Tong XuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
Jacek K PinskiUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Sue InglesKeck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
Timothy Junius TricheChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Gary R MacVicarIllinois CancerCare PC, Peoria.
Daniel A VaenaHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City.
Anthony W CrispinoUsTOO Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.
David James McConkeyJohns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Primo N LaraUC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Maha H A HussainNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
David I QuinnUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Tanya B DorffCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Seth Paul LernerScott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ian ThompsonChristus Health, San Antonio, Texas.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Catherine M. Tangen · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Biomarkers of Hormone Therapy Response in a Multicenter Prostate Cancer TrialR01CA172436 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDKORN, AMIR, INGLES, SUE ANN · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172436NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), new first-line combination therapies have enhanced overall survival (OS), but clinical outcomes for individual patients vary greatly and are difficult to predict. Peripheral blood circulating tumor cell (CTC) count is the most extensively validated prognostic liquid biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and recent studies have suggested that it may also be informative in mHSPC. Objective: To examine the prognostic value of CTC count in men with mHSPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, peripheral blood was drawn at registration (baseline) and at progression to mCRPC in the S1216 study (March 1, 2013, to July 15, 2017), a phase 3, prospective, randomized clinical trial in men with mHSPC. The CTCs were enumerated using a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared isolation platform. Counts were categorized as 0, 1 to 4, or 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL based on the prognostic value of these cut points in prior studies. The data analysis was performed between October 28, 2022, and June 15, 2023. Exposure: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Circulating tumor cell count was evaluated for an association with 3 prespecified trial end points: OS, progression-free survival, and 7-month prostate-specific antigen, after adjusting for other baseline covariates using proportional hazards and logistic regression models. Results: Of 1313 S1216 participants (median [IQR] age, 68 [44-92] years), evaluable samples from 503 (median [IQR] age, 69 [46-90] years) with newly diagnosed mHSPC were collected at baseline, and 93 samples were collected at progression. Baseline counts were 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL in 60 samples (11.9%), 1 to 4 CTCs per 7.5 mL in 107 samples (21.3%), and 0 CTCs per 7.5 mL in 336 samples (66.8%). Median OS for men with 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL was 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.1-31.2 months) compared with 56.2 months (95% CI, 45.7-69.8 months) for men with 1 to 4 CTCs per 7.5 mL and not reached at 78.0 months follow-up for men with 0 CTCs per 7.5 mL. After adjusting for baseline clinical covariates, men with 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL at baseline had a significantly higher hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 2.22-4.68) and disease progression (hazard ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.76-3.43) and a lower likelihood of prostate-specific antigen complete response (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.54) compared with men with 0 CTCs per 7.5 mL at baseline. Adding baseline CTC count to other known prognostic factors (covariates only: area under the curve, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79) resulted in an increased prognostic value for 3-year survival (area under the curve, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84). Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, the findings validate CTC count as a prognostic biomarker that improved upon existing prognostic factors and estimated vastly divergent survival outcomes regardless of subsequent lines of therapy. As such, baseline CTC count in mHSPC may serve as a valuable noninvasive biomarker to identify men likely to have poor survival who may benefit from clinical trials of intensified or novel regimens.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39374015
PMCPMC11581504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.