ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Critical Impact of Working Distance on OCT Imaging: Correction of Optical Distortion and Its Effects on Measuring Retinal Curvature.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motion-corrected Gaussian, mean, and parametric curvature mapping of the posterior eye with pupil-tracked whole-eye OCT.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Quantitative measurement using panretinal optical coherence tomography with three-dimensional curve distortion correction.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Effect of Deep Optic Nerve Head Morphology on Lamina Cribrosa and Peripapillary Scleral Configurations in Healthy Eyes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the impact of working distance (WD) on optical distortion in optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and to evaluate the effectiveness of optical distortion correction in achieving consistent retinal Bruch's membrane (BM) layer curvature, regardless of variations in WD. Methods: Ten subjects underwent OCT imaging with four serial macular volume scans, each employing distinct WD settings adjusted by balancing the sample and reference arm of the OCT interferometer (eye length settings changed). Either of two types of 30° standard objectives (SOs) was used. A ray tracing model was used to correct optical distortion, and BM layer curvature (represented as the second derivative of the curve) was measured. Linear mixed effects (LME) modeling was used to analyze factors associated with BM layer curvature, both before and after distortion correction. Results: WD exhibited significant associations with axial length (β = -1.35, P < 0.001), SO type (P < 0.001), and eye length settings (P < 0.001). After optical distortion correction, the mean ± SD BM layer curvature significantly increased from 16.80 ± 10.08 µm-1 to 49.31 ± 7.50 µm-1 (P < 0.001). The LME model showed a significant positive association between BM layer curvature and WD (β = 1.94, P < 0.001). After distortion correction, the percentage change in BM layer curvature due to a 1-mm WD alteration decreased from 9.75% to 0.25%. Conclusions: Correcting optical distortion in OCT imaging significantly mitigates the influence of WD on BM layer curvature, enabling a more accurate analysis of posterior eye morphology, especially when variations in WD are unavoidable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.