ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
The Impact of Spliceosome Inhibition in SF3B1-Mutated Uveal Melanoma.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alternative Splicing: A Critical Regulator in Human Bone Biology and Tumor Progression.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Unfortunately, treatment of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) with metastatic disease is limited. Twenty percent of patients with UM harbor a mutation in the splicing factor gene SF3B1, suggesting that aberrant spliceosome function plays a vital role in tumorigenesis. Splicing inhibitors exploit the preferential sensitivity of spliceosome-compromised leukemic cells to these compounds. Methods: We studied the effect of the splicing inhibitor E7107 using two UM cell lines and ex vivo cultured SF3B1- and BAP1-mutated primary UM tumor slices. These UM cell lines and ex vivo tumor slices were exposed for 24 hours to different concentrations of E7107. Tumor slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and incubated with BAP1, MelanA, MIB-1, and caspase-3 antisera. Results: The E7107-exposed UM cell lines exhibited decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis, with the greatest effect on SF3B1-mutated UM cells. A similar effect on UM tumor slices was observed upon exposure to E7107. Additionally, RNA was isolated for differential isoform expression analysis. No significant difference in isoform usage was found genome-wide. However, specific genes were differentially expressed after E7107 treatment in the SF3B1-mutated samples. Moreover, E7107 had the greatest effect on intron retention. Conclusions: This study indicates/suggests that mutated SF3B1 UM cells are more sensitive to the splicing inhibitor E7107 than wild-type SF3B1 UM cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.