Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39374010›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

The Impact of Spliceosome Inhibition in SF3B1-Mutated Uveal Melanoma.

Josephine Q N Nguyen, Wojtek Drabarek, Aïsha M C H J Leeflang, Tom Brands, Thierry P P van den Bosch, Robert M Verdijk, Harmen J G van de Werken, Job van Riet, Dion Paridaens, Annelies de Klein and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Josephine Q N NguyenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wojtek DrabarekThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Aïsha M C H J LeeflangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom BrandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thierry P P van den BoschDepartment of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert M VerdijkThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Harmen J G van de WerkenCancer Computational Biology Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Job van RietCancer Computational Biology Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dion ParidaensDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annelies de KleinDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin BrosensDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Emine KiliçDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Medical Center Rotterdam, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Unfortunately, treatment of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) with metastatic disease is limited. Twenty percent of patients with UM harbor a mutation in the splicing factor gene SF3B1, suggesting that aberrant spliceosome function plays a vital role in tumorigenesis. Splicing inhibitors exploit the preferential sensitivity of spliceosome-compromised leukemic cells to these compounds. Methods: We studied the effect of the splicing inhibitor E7107 using two UM cell lines and ex vivo cultured SF3B1- and BAP1-mutated primary UM tumor slices. These UM cell lines and ex vivo tumor slices were exposed for 24 hours to different concentrations of E7107. Tumor slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and incubated with BAP1, MelanA, MIB-1, and caspase-3 antisera. Results: The E7107-exposed UM cell lines exhibited decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis, with the greatest effect on SF3B1-mutated UM cells. A similar effect on UM tumor slices was observed upon exposure to E7107. Additionally, RNA was isolated for differential isoform expression analysis. No significant difference in isoform usage was found genome-wide. However, specific genes were differentially expressed after E7107 treatment in the SF3B1-mutated samples. Moreover, E7107 had the greatest effect on intron retention. Conclusions: This study indicates/suggests that mutated SF3B1 UM cells are more sensitive to the splicing inhibitor E7107 than wild-type SF3B1 UM cells.

Indexed as

ApoptosisMelanomaMutationPhosphoproteinsRNA Splicing FactorsSpliceosomesUveal NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalEpoxy CompoundsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMacrolidesRibonucleoprotein, U2 Small NuclearRNA SplicingTumor Cells, CulturedBAP1 protein, humanE 7107Epoxy CompoundsMacrolidesPhosphoproteinsRibonucleoprotein, U2 Small NuclearRNA Splicing FactorsSF3B1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin Thiolesterase

Identifiers

PMID39374010
PMCPMC11463709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.