ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2024
Differences in motor network reorganization between patients with good and poor upper extremity impairment outcomes after stroke.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural connectome changes as biomarkers of stroke recovery: a longitudinal 7T MRI study.BMC neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in cortical excitability after stroke are closely associated with motor function recovery. This study aimed to clarify the motor network reorganization mechanisms corresponding to the different clinical outcomes of upper limb motor impairment in patients with subacute stroke. Motor function was assessed before rehabilitation (pre), after rehabilitation (post), and at the 1-year follow-up (follow-up) using the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity scale. Further, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected in both pre- and post-conditions. Twenty patients with stroke were categorized into good and poor outcome groups based on motor impairments at the 1-year follow-up. Functional connections between motor-related regions of interest and the rest of the brain were subsequently calculated. Finally, the correlation between motor network reorganization and behavioral improvement at the 1-year follow-up was analyzed. The good outcome group exhibited a positive precondition motor function and continuous improvement, whereas the poor outcome group showed a weak precondition motor function and insignificant improvement. Contralesional hemisphere-related connections were found to be higher in the good outcome group pre-conditioning, with both groups showing minimal change post-conditioning, while no relationship with motor impairment was found. Long interhemispheric connections were decreased and increased in the good and poor outcome groups respectively, and were negatively correlated with motor impairment. Different motor network reorganizations during the subacute phase can influence the varying motor outcomes in the affected upper limb after stroke. These findings may serve as the theoretical basis for future neuromodulatory research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39373958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.