ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in the studies of pharmacoresistant epilepsy- a review based on literature analysis (2015-2025).Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Advanced neuroimaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: state of the art and future perspectives.Neuroradiology · 2026Review
- The associations between epilepsy, metabolism, and their clinical implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Predicting postoperative motor outcomes in the surgical management of Rolandic focal cortical dysplasia: the role of glucose metabolism.BMC medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate [
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 40 patients and 25 controls. Patients were categorized into drug-sensitive epilepsy (n = 22) and drug-resistant epilepsy (n = 18) according to the seizure frequency at follow-up. All patients underwent two [
resultsThe drug-sensitive group showed a lower |AI| at both baseline (P = 0.038) and follow-up (P = 0.003) PET scans than the drug-resistant group. |AI| decreased in the drug-sensitive group and increased in the drug-resistant group across scans, but these trends were not statistically significant (P = 0.240 and P = 0.450, respectively). Both groups exhibited hypometabolism at baseline. The drug-sensitive group showed less hypometabolic brain regions than the drug-resistant group. The drug-sensitive maintained stable level of hypometabolism between the two scans, whereas the drug-resistant group showed an increasing hypometabolism. Network analysis demonstrated that the drug-sensitive group had a higher global efficiency, average degree, and clustering, along with a shorter characteristic path length compared to the drug-resistant group.
conclusionsFor the first time, this study revealed in vivo cerebral glucose metabolic pattern of nonsurgical pediatric epilepsy patients treated by antiepileptic drugs. Especially, drug-resistant epilepsy patients represented significantly extensive and progressive hypometabolism with inefficient brain network connectivity compared with drug-sensitive epilepsy. [
Indexed as
Identifiers
39373899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.