ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024
Factors Associated with Caregivers' Decisions to Pursue a Diagnostic Evaluation After a Positive Autism Screen in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe sought to understand whether a child's sex, age, race, ethnicity, caregiver education, family income, and/or number of endorsed autism signs are associated with a caregiver's decision to pursue an autism diagnostic evaluation after their child received a positive autism screen.
methods129 children, 17-30 months, received a positive autism screen on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised with Follow-Up, and all caregivers were offered ready access to a diagnostic evaluation by a trained professional in English or Spanish at no cost.
results88 children received an evaluation and 41 did not. The likelihood of receiving an evaluation was associated with the child's race. Only 58.1% of Black children were evaluated, compared to 80% of Hispanic/Latino and 88.5% of White children. Children of Spanish-speaking caregivers showed high rates of evaluation completion (85.7%). Children who were evaluated versus were not evaluated did not significantly differ in terms of child's sex, number of autism signs endorsed by the caregiver, caregiver's education and preferred language (English versus Spanish), or household income.
conclusionEven though the present study removed many common barriers to receiving a timely diagnostic evaluation, caregivers of Black children were less likely to pursue an autism diagnostic evaluation for their child. Future research is needed to understand the needs and perspectives of Black families to promote engagement in clinical care and reduce disparities in receiving a timely autism diagnosis which is important for accessing supports and services that can improve children's outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.