Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373843›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2024

Long-Term (12-Month) Safety and Tolerability of STS101 (Dihydroergotamine Nasal Powder) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Data from the Phase 3 Open-Label ASCEND Study.

Stewart J Tepper, Detlef Albrecht, Jessica Ailani, Louis Kirby, Shannon Strom, Alan M Rapoport

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04406649 (An Open-Label, 12-Month Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of STS101), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04406649 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-Label, 12-Month Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of STS101 (Dihydroergotamine Nasal Powder) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorSatsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2020 to 2023Enrolled482ConditionsMigraine, Migraine With Aura, Migraine Without AuraArmsDihydroergotamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stewart J TepperThe New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-6638
Detlef AlbrechtSatsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 4819 Emperor Blvd, Suite 340, Durham, NC, 27703, USA. detlef@satsumarx.com.ORCID 0009-0009-8702-8199
Jessica AilaniDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8106-4927
Louis KirbyIndependent Clinical Consultant, Paradise Valley, AZ, USA.
Shannon StromSatsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 4819 Emperor Blvd, Suite 340, Durham, NC, 27703, USA.
Alan M RapoportDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6311-8562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSTS101 is an investigational drug-device combination comprising 5.2 mg dihydroergotamine (DHE) powder (6.0 mg DHE mesylate) in a single-use nasal delivery device for the acute treatment of migraine. The primary objective of the ASCEND trial was to assess long-term safety and tolerability of STS101 in the acute treatment of migraine attacks across 12-18 months, with secondary objectives describing efficacy.

methodsASCEND was an open-label study of STS101 in adults aged 18-65 years with a ≥ 1 year history of migraine with or without aura, with onset before the age of 50 years and 4-12 migraine attacks/month and < 15 headache days/month in each of the 3 months prior to screening. Exclusion criteria included diagnosis of non-migraine headache, history of cerebrovascular disease, and ≥ 2 cardiovascular risk factors. After establishing eligibility, participants could self-administer STS101 5.2 mg as needed for up to 2 doses within 24 h to treat a single migraine attack and up to 12 doses/month. Safety and tolerability evaluations included physical and nasal examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) assessments. Participants used an electronic diary to record exploratory efficacy parameters, including intensity of headache pain and associated migraine symptoms (photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea). Participant impression questions were asked at months 3, 6, and 12.

resultsOf the 6610 migraine attacks treated with a total of 8234 STS101 doses in 344 participants, 945/6610 (14.3%) were associated with a TEAE. Events were predominantly mild or moderate in nature and rarely led to premature study discontinuation (15/344 [4.4%] participants). Treatment was associated with rapid onset of freedom from pain (36.6%, 67.1%, and 85.5% of treated attacks 2, 4, and 24 h post-dose, respectively), freedom from most bothersome symptoms (54.3%, 79.6%, and 91.3%), and headache relief (66.5%, 89.1%, and 94.3%). Most participants rated treatment results as good or very good and ease of use as easy or very easy at all time points (months 3, 6, and 12) and indicated they were likely or very likely to use STS101 again.

conclusionsThe repeated long-term, as-needed use of STS101 was well tolerated, demonstrating a favorable safety profile in the acute treatment of migraine attacks in appropriately indicated adults. Exploratory efficacy evaluations indicated beneficial effects, which warrant further evaluation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identification NCT04406649.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalDihydroergotamineMigraine DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPowdersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDihydroergotaminePowders

Identifiers

PMID39373843
PMCPMC11543709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.