ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Graph neural networks in multi-stained pathological imaging: extended comparative analysis of Radiomic features.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph feature selection for enhancing radiomic stability and reproducibility across multiple institutions in head and neck cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning-driven multi-omics analysis: enhancing cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the application of Radiomic features within graph neural networks (GNNs) for the classification of multiple-epitope-ligand cartography (MELC) pathology samples. It aims to enhance the diagnosis of often misdiagnosed skin diseases such as eczema, lymphoma, and melanoma. The novel contribution lies in integrating Radiomic features with GNNs and comparing their efficacy against traditional multi-stain profiles.
methodsWe utilized GNNs to process multiple pathological slides as cell-level graphs, comparing their performance with XGBoost and Random Forest classifiers. The analysis included two feature types: multi-stain profiles and Radiomic features. Dimensionality reduction techniques such as UMAP and t-SNE were applied to optimize the feature space, and graph connectivity was based on spatial and feature closeness.
resultsIntegrating Radiomic features into spatially connected graphs significantly improved classification accuracy over traditional models. The application of UMAP further enhanced the performance of GNNs, particularly in classifying diseases with similar pathological features. The GNN model outperformed baseline methods, demonstrating its robustness in handling complex histopathological data.
conclusionRadiomic features processed through GNNs show significant promise for multi-disease classification, improving diagnostic accuracy. This study's findings suggest that integrating advanced imaging analysis with graph-based modeling can lead to better diagnostic tools. Future research should expand these methods to a wider range of diseases to validate their generalizability and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.