Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373762›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Research training during radiology residency: findings from the ESR Radiology Trainee Forum survey.

Michail E Klontzas, Martin Reim, Saif Afat, Viktoria Podzniakova, Annemiek Snoeckx, Minerva Becker, European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Should all trainees "do research"?Insights into imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michail E KlontzasDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. miklontzas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-933X
Martin ReimDepartment of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Tartu University Hospital, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Saif AfatDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Viktoria PodzniakovaDepartment of Radiology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK.
Annemiek SnoeckxDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Minerva BeckerUnit of Head and Neck and Maxilofacial Radiology, Division of Radiology, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo elucidate the research training exposure of radiology residents across ESR country members.

methodsA 30-question survey was constructed by the Radiology Trainee Forum and was distributed among residents and subspecialty fellows of countries members of the ESR. The survey examined the training environment, the status of research training and publications among trainees, the conditions under which research was conducted, and the exposure to activities such as grant proposal preparation and manuscript reviewing. Descriptive statistics and the chi-square test were used to assess the responses to survey questions and evaluate factors related to these responses.

resultsA total of 159 participants from 29 countries provided fully completed questionnaires. Only 12/159 trainees already had a PhD degree and nearly half had never published a PubMed-indexed manuscript (76/159, 47.8%). Among those who published their papers during radiology training, most did so in the first or second year of residency (n = 26 and n = 20 participants, respectively). Most participants (79%) did not receive further statistical training during residency, fifty-five out of 159 (34.59%) respondents never had any guidance/training on how to read a paper and 58 out of 159 (36.48%) had never been encouraged to participate in any research. Most of them had worked after hours to carry out research at least a few times (47/159, 29.56%) or always (82/159, 51.57%).

conclusionAnalysis of research training among radiology trainees was performed. Areas for improvement were identified that can prompt changes in training curricula to prepare a highly competent European workforce. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This survey has identified deficits in research training of radiology residents across countries members of ESR, pinpointing areas for improvement to fortify the future of radiology in Europe. KEY POINTS: Research exposure and training of radiology residents varies across countries and members of ESR. Radiology residents largely lack systematic research training, dedicated research time, and guidance. Areas for improvement in research training of radiology residents have been identified, aiding the fortification of radiology research across Europe.

Indexed as

Medical educationRadiologyResearchSurveyTraining programmes

Identifiers

PMID39373762
PMCPMC11458849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.