ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024
Target-site cefiderocol pharmacokinetics in soft tissues of healthy volunteers.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cefiderocol: A Comprehensive Review of Chemistry, Mechanisms of Resistance, and Clinical Applications in the Era of Multidrug Resistance.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Use of Cefiderocol in Management of Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Patients Admitted to a Burn Center.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Cefiderocol pharmacokinetics during acute pulmonary exacerbations in hospitalized adult persons with cystic fibrosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCefiderocol may potentially be used to treat skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). However, the pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol in human soft tissues have not yet been determined. The objective of the present PK study was to investigate whether target-site concentrations of cefiderocol are sufficiently high for the treatment of SSTIs.
methodsIn this pharmacokinetic study, a single intravenous dose of 2 g cefiderocol was administered to eight healthy male volunteers. Drug concentrations were determined in plasma, muscle and subcutis over 8 h. Free plasma concentrations were calculated using the plasma protein binding determined with ultrafiltration. Free tissue concentrations were obtained using microdialysis. Penetration ratios were calculated as AUC0-8h_free_tissue/AUC0-8h_free_plasma. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) was determined using Monte Carlo simulations.
resultsCefiderocol showed good tissue penetration, with mean penetration ratios ± standard deviation of 0.99 ± 0.33 and 0.92 ± 0.30 for subcutis and muscle, respectively. Cefiderocol pharmacokinetics in plasma were best described with a two-compartment model, and tissue concentrations were described by scaling the tissue concentrations to concentrations in the peripheral compartment of the plasma model. For a thrice-daily regimen with 2 g doses intravenously infused over 3 h, PTA was ≥90% for MIC values up to 4 mg/L, both based on free plasma and soft tissue pharmacokinetics.
conclusionsThis study indicates that a dose of 2 g cefiderocol achieves concentrations in plasma considered sufficient for treating relevant bacterial species. Assuming a comparable PK/PD target for soft tissues, sufficiently high concentrations would also be achieved in soft tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.