ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Microbiome Geographic Population Structure (mGPS) Detects Fine-Scale Geography.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The human skin microbiome: factors affecting individuality and application in forensic investigations.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Microbes as Teachers: Rethinking Knowledge in the Anthropocene.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, sequencing data generated by large microbiome projects showed that taxa exhibit patchy geographical distribution, raising questions about the geospatial dynamics that shape natural microbiomes and the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes. Answering these questions requires distinguishing between local and nonlocal microorganisms and identifying the source sites for the latter. Predicting the source sites and migration routes of microbiota has been envisioned for decades but was hampered by the lack of data, tools, and understanding of the processes governing biodiversity. State-of-the-art biogeographical tools suffer from low resolution and cannot predict biogeographical patterns at a scale relevant to ecological, medical, or epidemiological applications. Analyzing urban, soil, and marine microorganisms, we found that some taxa exhibit regional-specific composition and abundance, suggesting they can be used as biogeographical biomarkers. We developed the microbiome geographic population structure, a machine learning-based tool that utilizes microbial relative sequence abundances to yield a fine-scale source site for microorganisms. Microbiome geographic population structure predicted the source city for 92% of the samples and the within-city source for 82% of the samples, though they were often only a few hundred meters apart. Microbiome geographic population structure also predicted soil and marine sampling sites for 86% and 74% of the samples, respectively. We demonstrated that microbiome geographic population structure differentiated local from nonlocal microorganisms and used it to trace the global spread of antimicrobial resistance genes. Microbiome geographic population structure's ability to localize samples to their water body, country, city, and transit stations opens new possibilities in tracing microbiomes and has applications in forensics, medicine, and epidemiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.