Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373350›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025

Renaissance of Chlorine Evolution Reaction: Emerging Theory and Catalytic Materials.

Jinjong Kim, Muhammad Usama, Kai S Exner, Sang Hoon Joo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tungsten-Doped RuOSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Atomically Ru-Doped CoSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification of Ni-NJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Renaissance of Chlorine Evolution Reaction: Emerging Theory and Catalytic Materials.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinjong KimDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8424-3688
Muhammad UsamaFaculty of Chemistry Theoretical Catalysis and Electrochemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3608-3411
Kai S ExnerFaculty of Chemistry Theoretical Catalysis and Electrochemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2934-6075
Sang Hoon JooDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8941-9662

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2033 - 390677874 - RESOLVNational Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00415940National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00450102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorine (Cl

Indexed as

catalyst designchlor–alkali electrolysischlorine evolution reactiontheory

Identifiers

PMID39373350
PMCPMC11701343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.