ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024
Development and Validation of an AI-Driven System for Automatic Literature Analysis and Molecular Regulatory Network Construction.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BioGSF: a graph-driven semantic feature integration framework for biomedical relation extraction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of an AI-Driven System for Automatic Literature Analysis and Molecular Regulatory Network Construction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decoding gene regulatory networks is essential for understanding the mechanisms underlying many complex diseases. GENET is developed, an automated system designed to extract and visualize extensive molecular relationships from published biomedical literature. Using natural language processing, entities and relations are identified from a randomly selected set of 1788 scientific articles, and visualized in a filterable knowledge graph. The performance of GENET is evaluated and compared with existing methods. The named entity recognition model has achieved an overall precision of 94.23% (4835/5131; 93.56-94.84%), recall of 97.72% (4835/4948; 97.27-98.10%), and an F1 score of 95.94%. The relation extraction model has demonstrated an overall precision of 91.63% (2593/2830; 90.55-92.59%), recall of 89.17% (2593/2908; 87.99-90.25%), and an F1 score of 90.38%. GENET significantly outperforms existing methods in extracting molecular relationships (P < 0.001). Additionally, GENET has successfully predicted WNT family member 4 regulates insulin-like growth factor 2 via signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in colon cancer. With RNA sequencing data and multiple immunofluorescence, the authenticity of this prediction is validated, supporting the promising feasibility of GENET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.